The last one is literally Christian though @Sentient23
Was it by a catholic?
It was by a converso who prosyletized against Judaism
Need I repeat myself?
>>We see that this opinion regarding the Trinity and Incarnation contradict the official dogma of the Catholic Church at the time of Abner. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abner-burgos/ Technically but they didn't treat him like he was.
It's more accurate to say he was his own Christian
He rejected Catholic Dogma?
So he's not a catholic
He contradicted some of it, yes
Whether he contradicted anything is debatable
The point is he's not a catholic
Therefore not a Christian
Point proven
Imagine thinking the Gucci church is actually God's kingdom on earth
Imagine being a pagan larping as a Christian
Why does the Papal audience hall look like a serpent lmao?
The current catholic church is satanic
"catholic" under quotations
well
Catholic means "universal": how can a universal doctrine be Christian if it's not universal in the sense of syncretic theology and not in that all are welcome?
Because you simply have a flawed notion of "universal" here
https://onepeterfive.com/the-vaticans-continuing-idolatry-problem/
right
universal in the context of the "catholic" word doesn't mean inclusion of all religions/denominations lmfao
I know that, does your pope? @Sentient23
Fundamentally Christianity was suppposed to be anarchistic with shepherds of men.
"your" and "pope"
making a lotta assumptions bucko
I don't believe Francis is the pope
I believe that the seat is vacant
That's heresy according to Catholic dogma is it not? You're denying the papacy as the mouth piece.
Again with the more assumptions lmao
You're assuming that I'm denying "papacy"
You did, even if you use linguistic magick to fool yourself into believing otherwise
No how about let me fucking explain instead of continually insisting the contrary?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility
Do i need to restate myself?
Sure, explain why you're not a heretic
Again with the assumptions
