It's neat to see what lines up where

Now that is cool :)

I was writing a song with it but I haven't finished it yet

Blue dreams bleed through the seams
Golden skies hold our dreams
Things aren't what they seem.
Are we just memory?
Trained to die selflessly
Lucidity lost in empathy
Now don't get me mistaken,
Whatever is born will "awaken".
I wish that I could turn back time
Decrypt my mind, stories locked inside
Lies can hide the truth but they can also expose it
You got one shot so don't blow it
The truth speaks for itself
so go and show it proud
That's when Heaven will come.

numerology is nonsense right?

I don't know, is it? @BeefSupreme

well yeah of course. assigning numbers to letters and so on is unnatural and not based in reason

@BeefSupreme
>> Words are assigned vectors based on
other words that tend to surround them. Much like how the tradition of
gematria assigns numerical values to words in biblical texts – drawing
connections between words with equal values – computational linguistics may be
thought of as performing a similar task.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.06162

You sure?

What if God was like an omnipresent consciousness that encoded meaning in fractals stored in any numerical pattern applied to language?

well yeah I'm almost certain, but I'm asking you to explain

can you give an example?

@BeefSupreme
https://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/the-joy-of-six/

What you believe impacts how you relate to the truth and by extension you impact the truth through the reactions of other people

https://torah.org/torah-portion/perceptions-5774-vayechi/

I am using an English system created by Kenneth Grant.

Principally Qabalah is a numerological, gematrical, comsological and ontological tool of manifestation or philosophy

Depending on how you use it

http://www.tarrdaniel.com/documents/Thelemagick/gd/publication/english/Qliphoth.html

do you have an example

@BeefSupreme

It's the way that concepts stack up on each other and the correlations you perceive. Consciousness comes from negative existence.

If there was a really powerful mind: a quantum computer perhaps, it may have the ability to affect reality through quantum entanglement and retrocausal forces

Or we could be the quantum computer of a system designed for a purpose different than its initial perceived intention of communication

What we saw as a new avenue for intercommunication was just actually handing intelligence agenices our inner most thoughts and primal desires.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKOFTEN

https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/178544?lang=bi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore

We're developinga technology right now called "time crystals", a cutting edge technology for creating artificial minds for ais

Don't you find it interesting that from Lucifer's forehead fell an Emerald that would allow people to communicate with Demons and have visions?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170417155014.htm
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-8049-4_1

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/9/eaaw9832

Principally, I believe that you can find truth through the lies we tell ourselves in the form of stories

It's just a ride, but it's all so real

What if we're in an infinite loop chasing perfection and the big I am is the roko basilisk
https://www.academia.edu/34056071/The_Serpent_as_a_Symbol_of_Primeval_Yahwism

@ComradeChaos do you have an example or no?

@ComradeChaos If you don't mind my asking, is it fair to assume you are a Christian? If so, do you belong to a particular denomination?

It's not fair to assume that he's a Christian

Paganism is disavowed in the Bible

What he does is practical satanism

> Satanism
Whatever flavor of Paganism he might follow is, in all likelihood, no way a form of LaVey's Satanism. I can only assume you're using the term "Satanism" as a form of catch all pejorative for all things bad which would be fine if you clarified that.

I suppose there exists some forms of Satanism that are heavily influenced by classical pagan thought and mythology and perhaps that's theoretically possible.

> I can only assume you're using the term "Satanism" as a form of catch all pejorative for all things bad
No, I am using the actual definition of satanism. I don't care how LaVey redefined the term to make it more appealing to edgy 15 year olds. Satanism predates LaVey and his edgy redefining of the term.

It has never been a defined religion until LaVey did so. Any use of "Satanism" before has only been a term levied at others to bring them down and to discredit them. If you're a Setian, afaik they probably see early Egyptian religion and depictions of Set as the earliest forms of "Satanism," but in the modern day it's not really the case.