Message from @Sentient23
Discord ID: 688571461778276352
The bible is more internally consistent than almost any historical document
It wouldn't have been lost.
Furthermore the church declares paganism anathema.
> The bible is more internally consistent than almost any historical document
@Eoppa the bible was written over the span of 1500 years and is a compilation of the books of about 40 different writers which has seen numerous translations, censors, and editions, idk if one can call the bible as a whole a consistent text
This is what I mean
The biblical cannon was established before 1500 years...
You can just google biblical internal consistency I believe and you should get plenty
I just ripped this from images
And we can read further from the early church/church fathers
And universal magisterium
And ordinary at that
i found the source of the image, and its only about the greek manuscripts of the new testament
You mean the language it was in?
Why should that matter?
We've translated them into Latin for example, but we can still reference the Greek and such.
This strengthens my case if you haven't realized already
Just wait until Shepard shows up
He's gonna say even more horseshit
Then again, he's an occultist, so it doesn't surprise me
During the convo?
Lol
yes literally got asked to verify phone which i cant
F
F
@ComradeChaos yee i know dat
<:spooki:622667080457781260>
>>this sounds like the some hermetic stuff, can you confirm
Like I've tried to tell eoppa, hermetic philosophy influenced Catholicism quite heavily, so much so that they call their study of scripture hermeneutics
@Tekka
> Jesus was a son of god but not the only one
The absolute state of shirk
The Vatican does not approve
Who cares
The Catholics don't even believe in papal infallibility if they believe the Vatican seat is"vacant"
Wrong
Didnt i already debunk you on this? I think i did, and then u ran away without addressing my points
When i specifically told u not to lecture me about my philosophy since u evidently dont know anything about sedevacantism
@Eoppa is that the Aristotelian proof?