KJV is weirdly worded
I know of DR version, never liked it
Duoay Rheims was made before KJV and is less hard to read as well.
Hm what?
I find kjv more understandable
> Sex is unitive and procreative, having it without one or the other is a perversion of the act and sinful. @Eoppa eh, close enough. I'm not gonna add anything else to the convo.
Not at all emporer
And you seem unable to sift through the verses and versions, this is why we were given the magisterium, so we don't fall into error and sin.
What is the magisterium
The teachings of the Church
Catholic?
Of course
<:angery:605209422217871370>
@Eoppa I found a PC case for you
Based
977 dollars tho?
Smh
Better be ordained and blessed by a priest
Still not buying it.
@Enkrum pay for it on my onlyfans
If that was an actual sword maybe
If my memory serves me right
There was a verse mentioning that unnecessary complexity is bad
That everything should be as simple as possible
*unnecessary* is key i would imagine
The complexity of the bible is necessary, there is so much doctrine and beauty in it
Reducing it for personal understanding isn't always bad
Duoay Rheims Version didn't attempt any complexity, it just went for a proper translation.
KJV perplexes me because it has language that wasn't even common nor necessary at the time
I think they were trying to make it more esoteric or royal sounding or such
If only I could speak Latin or such so I didn't have to concern myself with this
@Eoppa Hm, the issue is
One who understands the Bible in a very basic way knows, in the grand scheme of things, the same as someone who spent they're entire life studying it
Because 1 of infinity, and 1000 of infinity are still infinitely small
Then tell me why there are those who deny the divinity of Christ? You can easily interpret wrong.
The amount of information not known is exactly the same
I use gnt because I've read thru maybe 30 different translations
And gnt is the best balance for me
Between readability and complexity
If there is one that is better, please let me know
