Message from @Maksim
Discord ID: 662481070196785162
Why can't it be quantified
I just explained
well do it again
No
just ctrl-v
You can have free markets without allowing international markets to have influence in theory, so i'd say they can with workarounds definetely be compatible
But if you have free markets with outside influences then surely no
I'd figure either evaluated capitalism or mixed economics.
Classic Fascist
yes.
Well if markets influence culture, that which we cannot know what is, then we cannot discuss it
too little knowledge
Free Markets mean corporations will always attempt to make as much money as possible
Not necessarily, again, workarounds can exist
A free market can exist without the free exploitation of resources
This means they will inevitably drift towards consumerism, greed, unethical marketing, etc
Can you show me a real example of one?
Which has been tested by time?
don't have to, i said they can exist.
me too <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768> , a lack of imagination or insight is not an argument
Here let me copy paste my economic policy so you understand where im coming from
i've laid out the concept
Ah shit i dont have it, hol up let me write it.
In summary, private industry is allowed to exist but if they in any way act against the intrests of the state or betray the people (price hike, artificially limiting supply, unethical marketing tactic, promoting moral degeneracy, poor working conditions, not keeping wages up with inflation and buying power, etc etc) then the CEOs are executed and the company nationalized.
No company would want to exist in that hellhole
Except you're wrong
war-time germany
I said want. Being coerced with force is not free choice
And even if they didnt, social polarization would lead to a point where it's either that or the communists completley cease all private property and industry
Who cares about what they want?
Markets.
I dont care.
The intrestss of the state and people come first.
a culture is influenced by things such as politics and economics as well as history, if your from lets say the USSR in the 1950 you have the history of being a socialist revolutionary, but if you reject socialist doctrine and you reject there economics and culture that is dialectical and historical materialism you are not really part of that culture are you
Everything that makes up a culture is subject to change
EVERYTHING
I mean the west used to be pagan, and I think it is fair at this point to say it used to be christian, all of which caused MASSIVELY different cultures
by default since a culture is subject to change
and a culture can change because people in the culture change, this means peopel alter culture and change how they think and thus people can adopt different cultures.
@Maksim
How do you respond?
@Chief Rocket Designer Yea and?
Not caring is not an argument. Besides, you just basically laid the foundation for an authoritarian system, not whatever culture is, so it has no relevancy to the actual discussion
if you accept what i say you can't be an ethno-nationalist
@Chief Rocket Designer Wrong