Message from @Maksim
Discord ID: 662482599825899530
don't have to, i said they can exist.
Im talking realistically
me too <a:shruganimated:421995622346784768> , a lack of imagination or insight is not an argument
Here let me copy paste my economic policy so you understand where im coming from
i've laid out the concept
Ah shit i dont have it, hol up let me write it.
In summary, private industry is allowed to exist but if they in any way act against the intrests of the state or betray the people (price hike, artificially limiting supply, unethical marketing tactic, promoting moral degeneracy, poor working conditions, not keeping wages up with inflation and buying power, etc etc) then the CEOs are executed and the company nationalized.
No company would want to exist in that hellhole
Except you're wrong
war-time germany
I said want. Being coerced with force is not free choice
And even if they didnt, social polarization would lead to a point where it's either that or the communists completley cease all private property and industry
Who cares about what they want?
Markets.
I dont care.
The intrestss of the state and people come first.
a culture is influenced by things such as politics and economics as well as history, if your from lets say the USSR in the 1950 you have the history of being a socialist revolutionary, but if you reject socialist doctrine and you reject there economics and culture that is dialectical and historical materialism you are not really part of that culture are you
Everything that makes up a culture is subject to change
EVERYTHING
I mean the west used to be pagan, and I think it is fair at this point to say it used to be christian, all of which caused MASSIVELY different cultures
by default since a culture is subject to change
and a culture can change because people in the culture change, this means peopel alter culture and change how they think and thus people can adopt different cultures.
@Maksim
How do you respond?
@Chief Rocket Designer Yea and?
Not caring is not an argument. Besides, you just basically laid the foundation for an authoritarian system, not whatever culture is, so it has no relevancy to the actual discussion
if you accept what i say you can't be an ethno-nationalist
@Chief Rocket Designer Wrong
Say in one sentence how it has relevancy
@Maksim why ```and thus people can adopt different cultures.``` This means culture is not tied to race
@Clincoin Because since i dont care, that ends the argument about care of the markets -the market's input on the matter is irrelevant.
So you negate the entire discussion because you say you don't care. Then why pose it in the first place
@Chief Rocket Designer No, its the same culture and people that change in of themselves
waste of my time smh
Of what they want
Not caring is not an argument. Besides, you just basically laid the foundation for an authoritarian system, not whatever culture is, so it has no relevancy to the actual discussion
Say in one sentence how it has relevancy
Who said it isnt?
https://discordapp.com/channels/587015719141507090/587028275918929925/662481169551720482
This is where the discussion is at
Now prove that concept is feasible, how would it work.
@Maksim where is my logic wrong
@Chief Rocket Designer Where is your logic correct
I mean
I am making a case I view as logical
I dont view it as logical
and substanitated by basic history
Gonna need a source