I don't see women as mindless drones or stupid

I also agree it's kinda wrong to put that on a woman simply for being a woman

How can someone assume hard work and intelligence be cooreleated with wealth, when models show that to be false - that a significant portion of wealth creation is up to chance/luck?

So?

Luck isn't a bad thing nor good thing it's luck

What's wrong with something being based off chance and luck

Everything has an aspect of luck to it

Wealth creation should be as level a playing field as possible, any one man who is capable of it should have the tools and the opportunity to generate wealth without chaotic factors such as luck - but rather factors such as hard work, passion, and determination

Why @Maksim

Why should it be level or equal

Why shouldn't it be?

So you can't justify it?

I can.

I'm asking you to simply justify making money making equal or level

It is to increase productivity, if every man was to know that they could become wealthy without leaving it to blind luck, but by working hard with passion and determination - every man would work much harder, increasing productivity. Coupled alongside with the disillusionment of the middle and working class today with the upper classes, a renewed model based on hardwork and determination, rather than luck - would make the middle and working classes less spiteful and disillusioned.

Can you show evidence it increases productivity @Maksim

I'd like to agree with you, if you have evidence

its common sense lol

@Deleted User It's an argumentative position.

To claim that it is automatically false without evidence in this case would be intellectually dishonest, it's an argument that is made. The position is we should try this.

Also common sense.

what even is common sense?

don't go there please

I actually agree with you, but how would we prove that this makes workers work better? @Maksim

has there been tests done? expirements?

maybe some nations have employed this?

Empiricism is invalid and unnecessary to prove something as sensical as this
People work because they want the ends they will receive by working (wealth)
If you ensure that the wealth they accumilate by working accelerates as they work more intensly, of course it will incentivize them

Again, it's argumentative, we should try it instead of dismissing it on the basis of "it hasn't been tried yet"

Basic logic can be used here.

Money incentivices people, that's nothing new.

the article literally says that some dudes created some game where they put different events in through algorithm and different skills to people.

it's a pretty shite job but it makes for a killer headline for losers who will indulge in not blaming themselves.

there's empirical data that successful people share a lot of traits as well as successful companies share similar habits and traits.

But hey it's easier to create a game and say you see you just need luck or smth

@Ater Votum My point still stands

isn't your point alluding to the opinion that the article is true?

The productive and successful people will know their ''luck'' depends on how much they push themselves to be the best they can be.

if a person has a cultural or personal mentality that he is not in charge and will resort to ''luck'' he let's go of possibility to gain greater wealth as well as to be as productive as possible to society as he can.

@Maksim

workers control of the means of production

😎