Considering you hardly understood the theory before we started talking

What units are you thinking when you talk of supply and demand?

I don’t see how that’s relevant

It just seems like a dodge really

Trying to dodge dealing with the data that supports the theory’s predictions

Don't you think it should be product/service units and currency units, respectively?

I don’t see how that’s relevant

Just seems like a dodge really

Trying to dodge dealing with the data that supports the theory’s predictions

mate i literally dont give a fuck about your empricisism

answer

Don't you think it should be product/service units and currency units, respectively?

Well the two ways you disprove a scientific theory are by showing some logical problem internal to it, or by showing its empirical predictions to be false

And as I said earlier you don’t seem to have any intention to do the former

I'm asking you a fucking question so i can provide an internal critique

So I’d like to get a move on

Answer my question kid

Don't you think it should be product/service units and currency units, respectively?

Stop running away

I don’t see how that’s relevant

Just seems like a dodge really

Irrelevant whether you tihnk its relevant its a question

Answer it

I dont think it is

Ok good you can proceed to think that, answer it

Why am I going to answer an irrelevant question. If I answer yes or no it doesn’t make a difference. Flip a coin and decide for me

Lol you tard you got to answer what you mean by equilibrium of supply and demand before you make the statement

Have you got ANY economics knowledge?

Flip the coin so we can get to the part where you start showing a logical problem with the theory

LOOOOOL

Fucking coward

I made it clear from the outset that I’m interested in a refutation.

>makes a statement about the equillibrium not being able to be explained by the capitalists
>cant answer what is mean by equillibrium

Im trying to present you a refutation you dumbfuck

The way you refute a scientific theory is by showing a logical problem, or that the predictions are false

In order to present a refutation I must understand what is meant by equillibrium

So lay out the logical problem then

I cannot lay out a logical problem if you dont tell me what is meant by equillibrium of supply and demand

this is your main argument

I have to understand it to refute it

It’s not an argument it’s a theory