I have to understand it to refute it

It’s not an argument it’s a theory

Irrelevant

You made a stattement about it being unexplainable by supply and demand

So I'm asking you

What do you mean by equillibrium of supply and demand

You're refusing to answer because you can't answer, because you have no economics knowledge

Well I’m wondering how it was you planned on making a refutation if you aren’t even familiar with the theory?

It just seems like your a motivated reasoner

As most angst ridden fascists are

I am familiar with the theory however evidently you're operating under a seperate definition so Im asking you WHAT IS IT

What is meant by equilibrium of suply and demand

It doesn’t seem like you are considering it’s taking so long to get to this logical problem

I already asked you above, whether it should be product/service units with currency units respectfully, you cant answer

Economically illiterate

I don’t see what the relevance is I’m just trying to hear the objection

My feelings about what anything should be doesn’t really matter

I have to know what is meant by equilibrium of supply and demand in order to propose an objection to it being unexplainable by supply and demand

I don’t see how you’re going to derive a logical problem from that

LOOOL

At best you could expect an inconsistency on the empirical front if it’s wrong on that account

Of course I'm going to derive a logical problem from it if I understand what is meant...

What do you mean by equilibrium of supply and demand, this is my 8th time asking now.

What units

I don’t see why it’s relevant

Alright bye

Thanks for demonstrating youre economically illiterate

alongwith embarrassing yourself

So you don’t have a refutation of the theory?

>asks what is meant by the main point
>doesnt want to provide an explanation
>yOu cAnNoT rEfUtE iT

It was a question

You love misquoting

Yes i cannot refute it since youre refusing to explain your main point. I cannot refute that which I dont understand

I asked you to elaborate on which units youre using to define the equilibrium

You're just refusing to answer

The main point is socially necessary labor time explains average price

What’s so hard to understand

I understand that but I don't understand what you mean by equilibrium of supply and demand, which you asserted cannot be explained by supply and demand, so Im asking, how do you define it

It’s when supply and demand are equal

If they are equal then what units are they refering to?

I don’t see why it’s relevant lol