Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 684127511193452559


2020-03-02 19:55:11 UTC  

Then present the Criticism of it which you've learnt

2020-03-02 19:55:15 UTC  

I have.

2020-03-02 19:55:20 UTC  

It's function as a tool of control

2020-03-02 19:55:22 UTC  

of masses.

2020-03-02 19:55:40 UTC  

Well your criticism of idealism presupposes the falsity of idealism, thus you presuppose the falsity of a conclusion within the argument against the conclsuion, making it a fallacious argument

2020-03-02 19:55:49 UTC  

You don't ask autists to define autism.

2020-03-02 19:56:06 UTC  

@21ooAB Could you get involved here, please?

2020-03-02 19:56:06 UTC  

Or ask Schizophrenics what schizophrenia is

2020-03-02 19:56:11 UTC  

^

2020-03-02 19:56:13 UTC  

That's a non sequitor

2020-03-02 19:56:13 UTC  

Because their reality is altered

2020-03-02 19:56:16 UTC  

but it's their reality

2020-03-02 19:56:26 UTC  

No that's a non sequitor, ideologies are not the same as mental illnesses

2020-03-02 19:56:36 UTC  

Can you make your point for idealism

2020-03-02 19:56:40 UTC  

I tried

2020-03-02 19:57:11 UTC  

You're asking me to argue idealism from the perspective of an idealist

2020-03-02 19:57:14 UTC  

which is impossible

2020-03-02 19:57:51 UTC  

Well I'm yet to see a refutation of it. You said it was false, and your argument as to how it was false presupposed the falsity of the conclusion, which I assume you know is a fallacy. You cant presupose the falsity of a conclusion within the argument against that conclusion

Also I never demanded that. I demanded an argument against idealism which doesnt presuppose invalidity of idealism within one of its propositions

2020-03-02 19:57:52 UTC  

To suppose that idealism is real for a minute is to be an idealist entirely

2020-03-02 19:58:09 UTC  

That's just ridiculously wrong. I can epistomologically conceive of X without believing X

2020-03-02 19:58:29 UTC  

Varies on if you're an empiricist or not

2020-03-02 19:58:34 UTC  

Let's say it's a warm day

2020-03-02 19:58:37 UTC  

but you're cold

2020-03-02 19:58:42 UTC  

Can you conceive it's warm?

2020-03-02 19:58:45 UTC  

No because you're cold

2020-03-02 19:58:52 UTC  

You can make-believe all you want

2020-03-02 19:58:55 UTC  

it's still cold lol

2020-03-02 19:59:30 UTC  

You are a rationalist

2020-03-02 19:59:32 UTC  

I'm an empiricist

2020-03-02 19:59:54 UTC  

You can conceptually? But again i seem to be noticing a pattern that whenever you get cornered, you start derailing
So, let me ask again. You asserted X was wrong. I asked for evidence as to how X was wrong. Your argument against X presupposed the falsity of X within one of its propositions, therefore making it a fallacious argument. Do you have an argument that's not fallacious against the position you asserted that was wrong

2020-03-02 20:00:10 UTC  

It's human nature to derail when in bouts of confusion

2020-03-02 20:00:15 UTC  

Its a yes or no question, dude

2020-03-02 20:00:15 UTC  

So forgive me for being human

2020-03-02 20:00:25 UTC  

I haven't derailed, i've sticked to the topic in fact

2020-03-02 20:00:30 UTC  

Are you going to answer my question?

2020-03-02 20:00:30 UTC  

I didn't say you were

2020-03-02 20:00:54 UTC  

well you said it was human nature, and im human thus id be bound by that rule, and im evidently not since i havent derailed

2020-03-02 20:01:00 UTC  

are you going to answer my question though?

2020-03-02 20:01:04 UTC  

Its a simple yes or no question

2020-03-02 20:01:07 UTC  

I will answer your question

2020-03-02 20:01:12 UTC  

Alright, lets see it