^Substantially what Rothbard said

No

no

Yes

If he said that kids have an implicit contract from divine authority

he said they dont have any self ownership and are property temporarily until they "run away" and prove self ownership

Or authority of inherent human value

That'd make sense

Second is a bit cringe

If a kid runs away is still a human

It still deserves care and concern

I've known plenty of runaways in my time

Some even deserved to be kicked out of their houses

But they're still humans

I think I have met exactly one fellow libertarian who believes Rothbards theories on childhood. Everyone else says that the parent is responsible for the child he brought into the world

Okay then why post them

You fucking autist

"dude I have to present all 100000000 possible points of view and defend shit I don't agree with because it's le star trek vulcan rational"

Shut up you gay retard

Why post them? Because ofvo still attributed a false view to him

Rothbard is literally the second most influential libertarian of the 20th century lmao what are you talking about

You are bad at arguing, you convince no one

You are a bad representation of your cause

Stop talking

I could have told him that I don't agree with Rothbard on this, but he would not have cared

Make me

I'm giving you advice

"make me" lmfao

This is like "don't put your hand on the stove"

You should give ofvo advice, if anything

Yeah dude I'm gonna fight you over you being a dumb shit on the internet

He doesn't need advice

He sure does

He's able to communicate coherent points

He isn't

He is able to pass for normal

I don't know if he is

CONCEDE YOURE WRONG!!!!!!

Maybe he's like a gay retard

Lel

"concede you're wrong"

It's so bad