Message from @Shaun
Discord ID: 687925843661684766
Do you read what you post? The screenshot literally says that he doesn't believe that children are independent humans but are a form of "temporary property"
Lmao imagine supporting that
That's weird shit man
literally an excuse to be a pedophile
I'm an older sibling, kids aren't property
They're just like adults who are sorta retarded
The best comparison is like an apprentice
anyone who's not a retard believes that
Or ward in the sense of older feudal law where there's a high power you swear to, not "property"
^Substantially what Rothbard said
No
no
Yes
If he said that kids have an implicit contract from divine authority
he said they dont have any self ownership and are property temporarily until they "run away" and prove self ownership
Or authority of inherent human value
That'd make sense
Second is a bit cringe
If a kid runs away is still a human
It still deserves care and concern
Some even deserved to be kicked out of their houses
But they're still humans
I think I have met exactly one fellow libertarian who believes Rothbards theories on childhood. Everyone else says that the parent is responsible for the child he brought into the world
Okay then why post them
You fucking autist
"dude I have to present all 100000000 possible points of view and defend shit I don't agree with because it's le star trek vulcan rational"
Shut up you gay retard
Why post them? Because ofvo still attributed a false view to him
Rothbard is literally the second most influential libertarian of the 20th century lmao what are you talking about
You are bad at arguing, you convince no one
You are a bad representation of your cause
Stop talking
I could have told him that I don't agree with Rothbard on this, but he would not have cared
Make me
I'm giving you advice
"make me" lmfao
This is like "don't put your hand on the stove"
You should give ofvo advice, if anything
Yeah dude I'm gonna fight you over you being a dumb shit on the internet
He doesn't need advice
He sure does