Message from @AsdfgQwert
Discord ID: 692349767275118623
North Slavs can be united much much much easier than South Slavs
Of course they can, they are similar as Germany and Austria.
That is not a slavic union.
That is a small group of countries.
That share locality.
The South Slavs, will, with time - be integrated into a Slavic Union
But we start with the Northern Slavs
They wont.
They are all the worst aspects of slac culture.
We could even open up to nations with lots of slavs for a process of slavification
Such as Molodova
Georgia
The languages map could be passable metric for determining how much the isolation caused by the recent slavic history impaired the potential unifications:
Ukraine doesn't seem right though, I though most of population knows Russian and uses it quite often.
It is perhaps gauging mother tounge
Gotta admin, Crimea is quite russian here.
What year
is that chart
2017 is the upload date.
Russia has been illegally sending migrants to Crimea since the fall of the USSR
What about that eastern part of Ukraine visible here? Is that natural, or also effect of paratroopers?
They wanted that port.
@AsdfgQwert What do you mean
Was the local population "modified", so to speak, by active Russian action in eastern Ukraine?
About Crimea I heard, I just didn't know that they did it for so long, now I'm wondering about that piece of land.
It is not unlikely
Russia has always tried to control Ukraine
`Source
Created using graphics editing software. `
Lol, bad form in providing sources. It could be basically anything, even coin toss.
Im not seeing a source, any - for that chart
Lol
That shouldn't be allowed for Wikipedia.
But many things shouldn't.
Tidbit: author of that map also seem to be supporting the idea of pan-slavism. With some spare foil to make a hat, we could start considering this map being pan-slavic propaganda, but I think that his views merely inspired him to do some hard work, and not sharing sources is just that - not sharing sources. Also, if I'd have a secret agenda, I'd use colors more similar to each other.
Still, that sucks. Considering that he also marked some minorities in Germany, he probably had some singular source. He could at least point at it.
> Based on maps created originally by Fobos92, published under a similar license.
Fobos92, in turn, puts phrase "Own work" in his sources.
It's a mess. I've been looking for a better map, and all are referring to some previous maps, which are referring to even older maps, and older, and older, and in the end:
> No machine-readable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims).
Eh, I guess we need to use google scholar instead if we want to avoid guessing.