Message from @AsdfgQwert
Discord ID: 692348980247527424
Germany pre-Otto was extremely varied
More so than Slavic nations now
It was not nearly as varied as north and south slavs
The Slavic Union i propose is for North Slavs
Lol
South Slavs are - jeez - its a whole thing
I rest my case.
North Slavs can be united much much much easier than South Slavs
Of course they can, they are similar as Germany and Austria.
That is not a slavic union.
That is a small group of countries.
That share locality.
The South Slavs, will, with time - be integrated into a Slavic Union
But we start with the Northern Slavs
They wont.
They are all the worst aspects of slac culture.
We could even open up to nations with lots of slavs for a process of slavification
Such as Molodova
Georgia
The languages map could be passable metric for determining how much the isolation caused by the recent slavic history impaired the potential unifications:
Ukraine doesn't seem right though, I though most of population knows Russian and uses it quite often.
It is perhaps gauging mother tounge
Gotta admin, Crimea is quite russian here.
What year
is that chart
2017 is the upload date.
No info on data sources.
Russia has been illegally sending migrants to Crimea since the fall of the USSR
What about that eastern part of Ukraine visible here? Is that natural, or also effect of paratroopers?
They wanted that port.
@AsdfgQwert What do you mean
Was the local population "modified", so to speak, by active Russian action in eastern Ukraine?
About Crimea I heard, I just didn't know that they did it for so long, now I'm wondering about that piece of land.
It is not unlikely
Russia has always tried to control Ukraine
`Source
Created using graphics editing software. `
Lol, bad form in providing sources. It could be basically anything, even coin toss.
Im not seeing a source, any - for that chart
Lol
That shouldn't be allowed for Wikipedia.