Fucking deranged spastic

We ought to have a rule against intellectual dishonesty.

fag

though you are definitely in violation of #5

defend your beliefs

Your whole copy pasta rant was a violation of rule 5

The Leftist Normie is very assured of its correctness, because he has fit the ideological mould prescribed to him by his Jewish-occupied media and education. He feels a very sure feeling of smugness, but cannot rationalize or explain why. This is because his ideology is suicidal, and cannot be rationalized. When confronted with this, all the Normie can do is jeer.
He cannot accept that his very existence is a joke.

Do I need to step in here?

Or can you behave?

im lurking and making sure it doesnt get bad

I'm always well behaved

@sabrinaisheresometime ss Alright thanks

np

It always a party

Ultimately, the victor of an argument like this is decided by the setting in which it took place. Leftists and Jews know that the common man, who cannot follow the conversation and makes decisions emotionally, makes up the majority of the audience, especially in periods of decline. So, they make emotional appeals and attacks on their opponent's character, which are easier to understand. It is up to the standards of the forum and the society whether or not their dishonesty is recognized for what it is, or whether they remain silent, either out of fear of reprisal from the judeo/communist bloc or (God forbid) because they genuinely bought it.

We have to ask then, what kind of forum this is, and whether people like you are allowed to speak and carry on with their bullshit.

Am I wrong?

If you would condemn me instead of enforce a standard, then I would have to say, I'm disappointed in everyone.

there is no argument

That is because I am correct.

i was having a discussion with desert fox about biases

then you began this unrelated psychoanalysis

I'd say it's very related. I outlined your biases for you.

Do you mean to suppose otherwise?

which is hardly a derision of me or my beliefs (even though my position as a communist is wholly unrelated), but more of a pathetic personal attack in an attempt to claim superiority

Okay then, go ahead and tell us how you came accross your communist beliefs.

you're clearly incapable of staying on topic, as the previous discussion has nothing to do with the evil judeo bolsheviks

I'd love for it to be something other than bandwagoning

What did this descend to

discussion between friends

i don't need to detail my life story to you

Ultimately, the victor of an argument like this is decided by the setting in which it took place. Leftists and Jews know that the common man, who cannot follow the conversation and makes decisions emotionally, makes up the majority of the audience, especially in periods of decline. So, they make emotional appeals and attacks on their opponent's character, which are easier to understand. It is up to the standards of the forum and the society whether or not their dishonesty is recognized for what it is, or whether they remain silent, either out of fear of reprisal from the judeo/communist bloc or (God forbid) because they genuinely bought it.

We have to ask then, what kind of forum this is, and whether people like you are allowed to speak and carry on with their bullshit.

If you would condemn me instead of enforce a standard, then I would have to say, I'm disappointed in everyone.

Then don't have a discussion about biases unless you're prepared to discuss them.

Unless of course, I'm right?

has nothing to do with my subconscious racial biases or a lack thereof

half of this has nothing to do with biases

Are you done blowing smoke?

this is just a canned psychoanalysis about how leftists are somehow genetically predisposed to being stupid or immature or something