Message from @Philippe
Discord ID: 683894646690283521
cringe
Yes you do. its the inevitable consequence of anarchy
whether you explicitly state it or not
Define anarchy.
absence of state
Okay, and how does that inevitably lead to destruction of society?
What anarchist community has lasted at all? They all have a bad tendency to fall apart or get crushed right?
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 About 3 years, but most times USSR couped the anarchist societies
So you guys can’t defend what you “build”?
They all fall apart or get crushed
@Sentient23 Also you probably know but I just wanna make sure you do: anarchy doesn’t inherently imply a lawless society.
What’s the point
> So you guys can’t defend what you “build”?
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 yes we can but we’ll need to organise better than we did last times
yes i know, regardless i oppose to it as it brings about destruction
Lol it is a lawless society
@Sentient23 ok but how does it?
lawless in reference to state laws
Im already debating someone philip, later
So organize better as in make a state?
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 no...
It seems states are much better organized than you are
Anarchist can’t build anything
I didn’t say a thing about my ideology yet..
They only destroy
No..
Yes
Now lemme type haha
anarchy cringe too
🧟 🦥
Anarchy is cringe
How old are you 16?
Philip, since your butt buddy ran away
The reason anarchy brings destruction is because it brings disorder, as anarchy is oppossed to hierarchy, specifically the state like hierarchy, one cannot ensure their, or their groups safety without invoking some form of hierarchy, and by doing so, the society stops being anarchist, so it fails
> Lol it is a lawless society
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 No. Anarchy comes from Greek words that mean stateless (or something like that lol). There are laws, it’s just that they’re decided by the community democratically instead of the state. > So organize better as in make a state?
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 No, organise better as in build a powerful voluntary militia and take control of weapons.
No it does not mean stateless lol
it comes from "an" - without
"arkhos" - ruler
thus its opposed to hierarchy
Yeah sorry.
Without rulers
Build a powerful militia that will inevitably lead to a state of it even goes that far