@arandomfrog man focusing on enemies, as you say, would be debating them

id beat him up irl

Not spamming them

Yes, debate

> id beat him up irl
@Sentient23 okay don’t say that tho

@arandomfrog come <#587028275918929925> then

@Philippe i would

Ok

i'd beat up anyone advocating for the destruction of the society

@Sentient23 we don’t advocate for the destruction of society

cringe

Yes you do. its the inevitable consequence of anarchy

whether you explicitly state it or not

Define anarchy.

absence of state

Okay, and how does that inevitably lead to destruction of society?

What anarchist community has lasted at all? They all have a bad tendency to fall apart or get crushed right?

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 About 3 years, but most times USSR couped the anarchist societies

So you guys can’t defend what you “build”?

They all fall apart or get crushed

@Sentient23 Also you probably know but I just wanna make sure you do: anarchy doesn’t inherently imply a lawless society.

What’s the point

> So you guys can’t defend what you “build”?
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 yes we can but we’ll need to organise better than we did last times

yes i know, regardless i oppose to it as it brings about destruction

Lol it is a lawless society

@Sentient23 ok but how does it?

lawless in reference to state laws

Im already debating someone philip, later

So organize better as in make a state?

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 no...

Lmao

It seems states are much better organized than you are

Anarchist can’t build anything

I didn’t say a thing about my ideology yet..

They only destroy

No..

Yes

Now lemme type haha

anarchy cringe too

🧟 🦥

Anarchy is cringe