the system is accelerating itself

theres no way to stop it

reformism is for feds

voting won't solve anything

@21ooAB whats the difference between ministry of interior and ministry of internal affairs

I have no knowledge but the wording seems like interior mechanics vs social stuff, but this is prolly wrong

Dead chat?

My claim: Bestiality is not immoral.

Your claim: wrong

#LoveIsLove

What do you have against it

Love isn't synonymous with sex

Or else love your mother and father would be very awkward

I will cede ground: the #LoveIsLove was a joke. My mistake

@Eoppa weird

I hold bestiality and incest not to be in the same class

Until proven otherwise, I will stand by bestiality as not immoral

What is your standard for immortality in regards to sex.

The tradition, sex is unitive/procreative, remove one or the other and it's immoral vibe?

Strange opinion

That's been the tradition for millenia

As does homosexuality and anything not for the sake procreation

So you accept this? Or what are you saying?

@OrthoGoat accelerationism =/= non political solution. The only way is forward yes, putting bricks on the gas pedal is a shot in the foot when the system has such a monopoly on violence

Its just extremely redundant to say accelerationism

Like nigga you aint accelerating jack shit

trump just banned immigration from the EU

What does it mean to have a fulfilling sexual relationship? In the absence of a definition, I will provide one, and you can disagree with it as you see fit: The sexual union must be a unifying act, where one partner is ideally complementary to another, such that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. To this end I say that the personality of anything can be object of sexual attention, provided it psychologically *completes* you in some way. Now if you genuinely need an animal to be your complementary, I will say that you are not normal and that you should not normalize your feelings in society. But that does not make it immoral.
there is also the claim that it is animal abuse, which seems least true of all. Why is the standard such that we can slaughter pigs, or keep birds in tight cages, or even *pet* animals if it becomes a case of consent? I doubt the cow consents to becoming a burger. And animals can seek out of sexual pleasure, or initiate it, if it is a problem of consent - sure, I’d be willing to say if the animal doesn’t initiate it it’s immoral, but it’s entirely possible for the animal to feel pleasure and seek it out as well.

based

@Eoppa

trump going nazbol mode

heck yeah

heil trump heil our people, heil victory!

@Ater Votum you just removed the procreative aspect

Unitive is also only in regards to marriage

Of which a human and animal cannot partake

Literally could not care less about consent

A partner in marriage should not withhold their body.

What is the function of sex

@Tekka No. Acceleration is natural. Reform cannot stop it and even if it could stop the acceleration of the system, it could not reverse it