well lets assume it does, all action results in harm to another

No they don't

one cannot do anything to help a group, without harming another

Im eating peanuts is that harming you

no, but it harms the other man who didnt get those peanuts

you inflicted suffering (no matter how minor and irrelevant it is) in order for you to get what you want

Ok... Im gonna to go to the bathroom ...who does that harm

those who work to maintain the system

they suffer for others to gain

There is no clean dichotomy between speech and action.

ok think of it like this

People also gain from action ( as you think of it ). So there's no way to tell the overall impact

there are two people

both want something

who gets it

for one to get it, one must lose out

Game theory says otherwise

Watch the movie "A Beautiful Mind "

no, one must lose out

how can both get it

how both gain when there is only one

@pennypal is a foid

***F O I D***

That means more than female?

Oh wait

She is delusional

The pen is mightier than the sword

Lmfao

Face butt whatever

She said she was older than me too god I hope not

Please tell me you don’t have kids

the worst part is that penny doesnt understand what im trying to say

Please tell me you don't vote

I do

The choir preaching to the choir

>voting

Oh...lol
.you meant you vote

no, the sword is mightier 🙂

And here I was thinking it was me I wasn't being understood... silly me.

no I understand you, your just wrong

I see your point. But it only applies in adversarial situations. If youre whole world is adversarial...then that's pretty grim.