Message from @LOGiK

Discord ID: 678073735059734538


2020-02-14 10:13:07 UTC  

<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>

2020-02-14 10:13:11 UTC  

Your move nazis

2020-02-14 10:13:40 UTC  

They played us like a damn fiddle

2020-02-14 19:01:55 UTC  

Well maybe that was the fucking plan to get rid off them in the first place.

2020-02-14 19:01:59 UTC  

<:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>

2020-02-14 21:16:37 UTC  

In which they’re holding their phone while driving and then call racism when they get pulled over

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/376763825904418816/677986582300459017/image0.png

2020-02-14 21:34:23 UTC  

im assuming alot of road accidents are caused by people on their phones

2020-02-14 21:34:47 UTC  

i dont think you need to look up those stats to know that

2020-02-14 21:40:48 UTC  

Most pedestrians just look at the lights and go

2020-02-14 21:41:30 UTC  

Add to that the fact that the elderly can for some fucking reason drive and you have a lot of easily preventable accidents <:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>

2020-02-14 21:59:28 UTC  

yeah but most old people be driving at 2 mph

2020-02-14 21:59:40 UTC  

and most road accidents are caused by young men

2020-02-14 21:59:46 UTC  

deadly at least

2020-02-14 22:16:09 UTC  

Monkey brains

2020-02-15 02:54:45 UTC  

Taking away peoples freedoms because they're old isn't really a good policy

2020-02-15 02:55:12 UTC  

uh

2020-02-15 02:55:14 UTC  

on the one hand, yes

2020-02-15 02:55:29 UTC  

on the other hand, reevaluating their skills frequently is good

2020-02-15 03:01:20 UTC  

Not really, experience usually compensates for age to an extent and expectations change

2020-02-15 03:01:55 UTC  

It's somewhat unfair to require consistent learning through life when age makes learning more difficult in later years

2020-02-15 03:02:56 UTC  

The fact is a 60 year old will find it far more difficult to learn than a 20 year old

2020-02-15 03:03:56 UTC  

Also part of the safety issues with older people is their reaction speeds deteriorating, that is specifically an age related thing

2020-02-15 03:06:02 UTC  

Yes that's the only reason

2020-02-15 03:06:07 UTC  

They have no reaction time

2020-02-15 03:07:16 UTC  

By the time they see someone in front of the car they have already hit them lol

2020-02-15 03:12:42 UTC  

@LOGiK I was thinking like 70 or 80, not 60

2020-02-15 03:12:58 UTC  

also they don't need to keep learning, just prove that they can continue to be a competent driver

2020-02-15 03:14:41 UTC  

By what standards?

2020-02-15 03:14:51 UTC  

Todays, or the ones they passed with?

2020-02-15 03:15:15 UTC  

Because if you say todays then my argument on continued learning applied

2020-02-15 03:15:30 UTC  

And you're also talking about literal age based discrimination

2020-02-15 03:17:07 UTC  

"you're now 70 you must take a test to prove your driving competence again" would result in a stronger argument for requiring retests every 5 or 10 years or something for everyone regardless of age than just a fixed competence proving at 70

2020-02-15 03:17:35 UTC  

uh

2020-02-15 03:17:36 UTC  

yes

2020-02-15 03:18:01 UTC  

reflexes are indisputably proven to degrade with age

2020-02-15 03:18:22 UTC  

I'm not arguing for a blanket ban after a certain age although I would support more frequent checkups as people get older

2020-02-15 03:18:35 UTC  

if they can compensate for it with experience then good on them, as long as they're able to meet modern safety standards

2020-02-15 03:20:50 UTC  

^

2020-02-15 03:22:50 UTC  

Also what's wrong with age discrimination? Nobody gets more fit as they age. Everyone deteriorates.

2020-02-15 03:23:16 UTC  

Lets have more difficult driving competence challenges for young drivers then

2020-02-15 03:23:34 UTC  

In fact, lets ban them from vehicles over 200 hp until theyre 25