Message from @LOGiK
Discord ID: 678087547003600906
Are you suggesting reactions times have nothing to do with responsible driving?
Que
a licence isn't a right, it's a privilege. tough shit if you lose or don't have one
Yes
Reaction times absolutely have 0 to do with responsible driving
<:what:382980756139409409>
Because a good driver drives in a way that compensates for their own reactions, as well as weather conditions and vehicle capability
Therefore whether or not you can use the breaks in time has nothing to do with responsible driving...
Correct
Do you like drive?
The distance you leave between you and the vehicle in front is the responsibility
Your reaction speed defines how close you drive
A bad driver will sit too close to stop, a good driver will give adequate space
Hitting your brakes at the right time is crucial in driving?
If older drivers aren't worse, why are their insurance rates higher?
Actuarial tables don't lie. <:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>
A slow driver will allow enough stopping distance
An excellent driver rarely needs their brakes
I cant tell if hes trolling or not. I pray not.
And if you're talking about needing to use an emergency stop, yeah, such things happen when caused by other drivers
I don't think he drives
Yeah
Okay do you drive?
Good drivers predict the road ahead, leave plenty of space between them and the car in front, and try to estimate what traffic ahead will do
Yeah
4 cars and a motorcycle
And you rarely use the brakes?
Depends on how aggressive I'm being and where I'm driving
I dont think you should be allowed to man rofl
I have dumbasses cut me off and I need to slam on my brakes nearly every day
If you have a dash cam and you hit them, it's usually their fault
That's not the point
Rules vary state to state but generally if a driver forces another to perform an emergency maneuver or evasion, they're at fault and if the driver fails to evade or stop they're still at fault
The danger is not the person with the slow reactiob
Reaction
Like I said. By the time they realize they need to use "emergency stop" they have already hit someone. Their brain does not register it fast enough.
But the one forcing them into the hazard situation
So basically they have to pay because other drivers are putting them in dangerous situations?
No it's not hazardous. They have to stop sometimes and they cant stop fast enough.
It's not about fault, it's about responding to suddenly changing situations
Cutting someone up creates a hazard?