Stirner did not reject morals, but decided that you should follow your own moral compass.

Religion does have its purpose- morals, and a guide for a cooperative society, can't group together a bunch of people with different morals and beliefs... now can we?

Obviously not

They serve a purpose of binding humans.

Sometimes for their own good.

I recommend you watch (when you have the time) a 6 hour documentary- "Adolf Hitler: The greatest story never told".

Watched it.

Beautiful but I think they had bs parts about Soviet genocide.

If I remember correctly.

I consider Stalin to be a nationalist.

A stunning documentary, really exposed how the winners of wars rewrite history, feed their children a false narrative of what really happened.

Yeah, same with the neoliberals who've rewrote socialism

With lies such as the holodomor

Stalin was a patriot for the USSR, clearly.

Yes, he invented socialism in one nation

He *implemented Socialism in one Nation.

Not to mention he is still very popular in Russia

You have the occasional drunks throwing things at his grave but then there are those who yell at them to get the fuck away and that Stalin was a hero.

Stalin managed to convert a Nation of poor farmers into a Super power in under 50 years.

Exactly.

National Bolsheviks love him and Lenin.

However the ideology of Communism is something I can never agree with, I find it flat out disgusting.

Hahahah!

Communism as done by anarchists and other drab is disgusting

It preaches identity politics over the actual working class

Like tranny rights

"Socialism always leads to Communism"

I cannot stand by Communism, not at all. The ideology is morally wrong.

If you're paid according to your needs, then where is the prospect of working harder to get more out of life?

I reject the only real bad thing about it, internationalism and racial equality

Do you believe all races are equal? (I sure as hell don't)

Equal in that they should have an equal start.

But where they end up is mainly up to them.

If they end up dirt poor under capitalism, they can fix that themselves.

We should *all* have an equal start, yes, but I'm asking if you think that some races (and cultures) are superior when compared to others?

I wouldn't say superior, but we should be kept in true diversity, like all of the colors on a pallette, they should not all be mixed into one.

Another analogy is how a farmer preserves and breeds his better stock.

"If you're paid according to your needs, then where is the prospect of working harder to get more out of life?"

So you'd say that American culture *isn't* superior to say- Saudi Arabian culture?