to choose

And they have in the past

Barely any

Not enough to make a difference

Most electors will vote for what the people vote for

If a radical candidate arises, the electors won't vote different

You can't assume that

again

For many states, I can

No you can't

any state

they're allowed to change

Nope

anyways

Many states require by law to go with the majority

it happaned in 2016

lol

8 dems switched

2 reps

So theres your argument out of the window

That was a record high

It's usually much lower

Infact it's happened in many elections

does not matter

The fact is there is no law saying that

and they have

You are forgetting that the minority can be dumb

And that the electors can have the same views as the radical candidates

Possibly, but again it's better than nothing

I think it works tbh

Thats why 8 dems switched

What about the winner takes all system

California had the third highest numbers of republican voters among states

And what did their votes do?

Nothing

thats fine

Why?

Because it's winner takes all

which I'm fine with

Thats basically not being able to vote

Why should somebody's vote not count because of their location?