I think it works tbh

Thats why 8 dems switched

What about the winner takes all system

California had the third highest numbers of republican voters among states

And what did their votes do?

Nothing

thats fine

Why?

Because it's winner takes all

which I'm fine with

Thats basically not being able to vote

Why should somebody's vote not count because of their location?

No you do vote

but you lose

It won't make a difference

If you vote or not

California would still be blue

You never know

And 55 votes would still go to the democrats

But thats not an argument for not voting

Just because "you don't have a chance" doesn't mean we should socialise loses

Reward winners punish losers

So the votes of millions shouldn't be counted because of "winners and losers"?

They are counted

but not enough as the other team

so they lose

They're not in the end

they are counted

they just don't win

The 55 votes go to one side

The republican votes don't count

They count

Nope

But they don't win

Why should your location matter?

Thats like saying , I excersised and burned 5000 calories but I ate 6000 so it me running didn't count

It does but you didn't do enough

The problem is worse in swing states

Look at florida in 2000

Whats wrong

It was basically 50-50