Putin just needs to act tough because he's a dick

If they were smart, which I'm assuming they are, they won't retaliate against a super power

brb

I don't think they will, and they haven't. I just think Assad is better than the alternative. He's been taking care of ISIS, plus he's a secular leader who protects Christians. He may be a dictator, but better than a terrorist state imo

k back m8

Cool

So are you a Christian?

yeh u could say that

Alright Ben

Mind if I send you a link to a recruitment server

Sure

Alright

just to ask bois, for the letter N, should I use nationalist or NRA. I'm doing acrostic for Republican btw

can't decide

I say nationalist

Hey guys how do you feel about backing out of the Iran deal?

Mixed

Yeah I'm just trying to get a feel for how everyone feels about it. I feel like their are a lot lies being portrayed

Fuck Iran

It's impossible for any of us to know if the deal was any good.

I'll trust the master dealmaker to make a better deal though

Hopefully its a treaty this time and not a deal. Because the deal Obama proposed wasn't official at all. Obama knew he couldn't get away with a treaty because a treaty requires Congress and House of Representatives. Therefore, there was no official regulations at all

Mhm, exactly.

The great thing is, if liberals hold it up, then all their crying about ripping up the deal backfires on them

@Donaldus Triumphus Wait how is it not official in what way? I thought Obama was within his executive power to sign it. Just like Trump was within his executive power to end it.

Executive orders can be gotten rid of by the next presidemt

Acts of congress need another act of congress to nullify it

You guys hear about what's happening in Nicaragua right now?

Students are getting shot up by the government military forces.

they take fee payment seriously over there

fee payment huh

My lovelies. We’re going to take over da world.

Silently but deadly

Half of Americans did not vote for either party. Both parties were voted for by a 1/4 of the population individually. We pretend this is a problem when, in actuality, both parties want to maintain this status quo. Having a population politically apathetic makes the bourgeois command of the system easier to maintain.

Trump has a low approval rating and it would be not different under Clinton. Both are Liberal politicians with complete disregard for the population. Have you even heard of the kind of crap Trump's daddy did?

At least China can boast an optimistic future and population with their Socialist market economy, grassroots system (allowing common participation in the runnings of the state), and plan to fully eradicate poverty by 2020 as is the purpose of the current 5 year plan. America can not boast this.

The Communist Party of China does as it says.

The Democratic Party and Republican Party say a lot of crap and do nothing.

80% of Chinese trust their system. 50% of Americans didn't even vote.

Why is this?

The legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party is dependent on serving the people and guiding the nation to prosperity. Of the falling poverty rates, almost 800 million of that can be attributed to Chinese Socialism. The legitimacy of American parties depend on lobbies and protecting the interests of the rich.

Why and how is Trump any different from any other American politician? Why should I consider him the international representative of the American people when only 1/4 of us even voted him in?

I mean who else is it going to be? Clinton lol

This would apply exactly the same to Clinton.

They are both Liberal politicians.

Rightists.

if its not the president then who would be the international representative of the American people?

the ambassador?

I guess he technically is lol