Well the chemical weapon attacks mainly on Syria's own citizens. I think the United States needs to set an example to the world on not to use chemical weapons. I don't know why I'd like Assad, he's a ruthless dictator. I have no reason to like him. Unless of course you believe it was a false flag, but even the Democrats don't think it was. Back in 2013, there were many conservatives who opposed a U.S. attack upon Syria. Reports have said over 1400 people have been killed from Sarin Gas since. The Syrian regime has launched numerous attacks using chlorine-based weapons that many times get very little media attention.
@Donaldus Triumphus There's no evidence that assad actually did the chemical attacks, there is however evidence that the US sponsored ISIS groups and al-nursa front also known as the FSA have done the attacks. Why should you hate other people because of how they run their governments? People in the "syrian democratic forces" often riot because they want to be apart of assads nation.
It's not about whether he's a dictator or not, but I don't like how he runs it as a dictator either. I think he's a terrible person and a violent leader. He represents a minority government of Alawite Shiite Moslems, whom of which represents nearly 20% of the country. Depriving most of the citizens of Syria from having enough to eat, viable infrastructure, and Rights and Freedoms, he's also for repression of Christian minorities. Denying the fact that innocent people of his country are being killed, he's just terrible. I'm willing to trust the Pentagon on the chemical attacks and Mattis on this one
@Donaldus Triumphus Would you consider a president who has to reunite his nation region by region while facing opposistion from all sides terrible and violent? Syria is secular though, he is apart of the baath party which is secular. People aren't able to eat in syria because the west funded the ISIS, FSA, and taliban uprisings, and tried to beat assad like they did gaddafi by bombing him and starving him out. They're being killed by your soldiers and mercanaries.
It's going to be hard to forge up evidence of 161 total chemical attacks in Syria and 1500 deaths, 14,500 injuries over the course of 5 years. There's been so many, no way they were all false flags. Nonetheless only 1 needed to have happened to justify they have had access to chemical weapons and have used them. Even if that 1 moment was a false flag (the latest one), the other 660 times need to be brought down. I bet you are the same kind of person who thinks the Holocaust was a Jewish hoax
@Donaldus Triumphus How would you know? Too big of a lie? Heat me out, what if the attacks actually occured but the blame was put on assad? We know that ISIS isn't above such attacks, and the FSA are actually ex taliban members from al-nursa front, so you have 2 terrorist nations claiming that assad was somehow behind terrorist chemical attacks..... really makes you wonder.
