If you want to censor outside influence that would surpress freedom of speech

And that's basically your logic

You have zero reasoning

Everyone can be affected.

But this goes againts your point

Considering media negative coverage for Trump was like 90 %

Konig, any last evidence or arguments?, we have seen none so far

Ofcourse we haven't.

He has no idea how to present ones.

He's going to post PDF and if he likes the headline, he'll call it evidence.

Yes, your point being?

You can influence someone but it doesn't mean you're going to persuade him.

Anywho, I've provided you evidence how Russians were paid and benefited Clinton for her elections... You on the other hand

What have you done?

You've provided a PDF where there are paid TWITTER trolls, but little do you know that you lack any sort of knowledge on marketing in the first place.

Did he rage quit?

lol, gone

Haha ofcourse

That's what liberals do

When presented with facts, they either shout or cover their ears

Didn't know when you leave all your messages get deleted

there's a reason why Marketing only focuses people with INTERESTS, not the ones that are not interested... So if I see someone on Twitter shitting on Trump - do you really think I'm going to change my mind about Trump and vote againts him? So stupid.

👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtJ14KUB3Ew LOOL

<@&418658386553602048> Wait, who banned him?

i did

he was sending PM with a bunch of Bs

What he send?

**well shit man**

He was spamming me too

i didnt mind the conversation until he started the PM's and threats

reeeee

Alright

He sent me a bunch of links and insults.

Shouldn't have deleted his messages, should've kept the history of him looking like a retard

LOL

monkey on display

That was funny.

@Deleted User were they like pastebin links?

still got this

LOL