Message from @Fere Nemo

Discord ID: 509650669612040195


2018-11-07 08:40:38 UTC  

@Fere Nemo when did I say they were in any way had correlation?

2018-11-07 08:41:50 UTC  

@Leiro レイロ Actually when you get rid of competition it gets rid of a purpose to work harder. Like if you're running a race with nobody, what's the damn point. There is no motivation, thus resulting in a slowness of progress (and if this was capitalism, a tremendous lack of profit)

2018-11-07 08:42:31 UTC  

Which is what puts other people at a bigger advantage than you, but in socialism that cant happen because theres no competition to begin with

2018-11-07 08:42:49 UTC  

there would be lol, it would be like "why do I have to work 12 hours a day if I can work two?", under socialism innovation makes your labour expended more productive, and thus people will be working lesser than they used to

2018-11-07 08:42:54 UTC  

and this could be argued to be a stump, blocking point in technology

2018-11-07 08:42:57 UTC  

look at innovation in the USSR

2018-11-07 08:43:14 UTC  

and yes, capitalism will hit a plateau when it comes to innovation

2018-11-07 08:43:26 UTC  

there would bi no innovation if it isn't profit ale

2018-11-07 08:43:35 UTC  

Please read a book.

2018-11-07 08:44:36 UTC  

lol, mises is a freaking thinktank

2018-11-07 08:45:17 UTC  

@TheBestGangster so, the problem with the profit motive is that innovation will cease when it isn't profitable

2018-11-07 08:45:34 UTC  

LOL!

2018-11-07 08:46:52 UTC  

mises is like Ben shapiro put on paper

2018-11-07 08:47:59 UTC  

Now where you reach a point where innovation will cease when it's not profitable, yeah sure if the product sucks

2018-11-07 08:48:04 UTC  

"LOL" is a modern idiom for the mind numbed "emperor's new clothes" progressive dumbfuckery.

2018-11-07 08:48:15 UTC  

LOL

2018-11-07 08:48:52 UTC  

no it isn't, it isn't about product sucking, are smartphones, tvs, medicine, everyday household electronics products that suck?

2018-11-07 08:49:10 UTC  

it ceases to be profitable when you can't produce profit from it, even if its a good thing.

2018-11-07 08:49:20 UTC  

or for the common good

2018-11-07 08:49:48 UTC  

Then... uh.... don't buy it? (dumbfuck)

2018-11-07 08:50:23 UTC  

Well if its a good thing, thats up to the consumers to decide

2018-11-07 08:50:30 UTC  

If the product sucks, then its not a good thing

2018-11-07 08:50:41 UTC  

then maybe it should not have been sold in the first place

2018-11-07 08:51:26 UTC  

Sure, capitalism uses dumb shits as a sort of battery, but what does socialism use?

2018-11-07 08:52:08 UTC  

Capitalism lol

2018-11-07 08:52:23 UTC  

lol

2018-11-07 08:52:46 UTC  

THAT IS NOT AN ARGUMENT DUMB FUCK.

2018-11-07 08:52:49 UTC  

no it isn't, this is nothing about the product sucking, has nothing to do with it, scroll upwards and I stated why innovation will be unprofitable due to a abundance of commodities driving down prices

2018-11-07 08:53:07 UTC  

if a product sucked, it would fail from the start

2018-11-07 08:53:15 UTC  

(kinda like socialism)

2018-11-07 08:53:23 UTC  

no, sorry that isn't a argument

2018-11-07 08:53:42 UTC  

look up on revolutionary catalonia

2018-11-07 08:53:52 UTC  

socialism, anarcho communism and anarcho syndicalism worked there

2018-11-07 08:54:19 UTC  

you just ignored my argument again, because youe point about products sucking is wrong.

2018-11-07 08:54:22 UTC  

"IF A PRODUCT SUCKS IT WOULD FAIL FROM THE START" = Capitalism

2018-11-07 08:54:34 UTC  

his reasoning is wrong

2018-11-07 08:54:47 UTC  

profit goes down not due to products sucking

2018-11-07 08:55:05 UTC  

I explained why it would go down

2018-11-07 08:55:26 UTC  

doublethink.

2018-11-07 08:55:31 UTC  

@Fere Nemo @TheBestGangster Read up on TRPF, you will understand why profit goes down.