Message from @π–˜π–”π–›π–Žπ–Šπ–™ π–—π–Šπ–šπ–“π–Žπ–”π–“

Discord ID: 514558404501438464


2018-11-20 20:44:51 UTC  

fuck you

2018-11-20 20:45:20 UTC  

SORRY OMG

2018-11-20 20:45:23 UTC  

that wasnt me

2018-11-20 20:45:26 UTC  

hol u[

2018-11-20 20:45:28 UTC  

up

2018-11-20 20:45:44 UTC  

that was my classmate cuz im in a computer class

2018-11-20 20:46:59 UTC  

that wasnt me again

2018-11-20 20:47:08 UTC  

hecko

@\ N_Logan \ how are the economic policies good

2018-11-20 21:17:41 UTC  

They just are

2018-11-20 21:17:48 UTC  

I don’t have to explain myself

No I mean how

They’ve failed everyone

Every time

Democratic policies imo are cowardly liberal compromises that only reinforce the existing structures that are grinding us all into dust

_"The best way to solve sexism in the workplace is by hiring more female board members and CEOs! Time for the age of the Lady Bossβ„’"_

Like, no, honey, the best way to do that is to build worker power through unions and undermine the power of capital.

lmao even then they should only hire on skill

Nothing unions should do

I mean it’s not an issue woman aren’t on the board because it should be based on skill of the worker , not gender

2018-11-20 21:53:37 UTC  

Ok liberals

I mean, I think it would be a good idea for corporate boards to be more democratic and representative of their workforce. The corporate board should, at least, proportionally match the gender composition of their workforce. Like, that isn't a super radical thing, imo

But my point is that liberals often than that just including more identity representation in capitalistic institutions is somehow going to fix them.

Why hiring and firing should be on skill not gender

Like the gender wage gap is bs

I mean, that's a whole discussion on it's own, but I think you're misunderstanding that I'm not necessarily saying that hiring should be decided on gender and identifies alone lmao

The idea that, I dunno, having more Lady Bankers would prevent things like massive mortgage fraud by gigantic investment banks is silly.

Or that having more women on the front lines is gonna solve America's militaristic attitudes in our foreign policy.

It's a cowardly cop-out that Democrats often do in order to placate progressive social sensibilities without the hard commitments to actually challenging institutions of power, like capital or the military.

Im all for more woman as long as it’s fair

As in good skill hiring

Well, yeah, I don't think anybody is out there advocating for unqualified workers to be hired...?

(Democrats)

Yeah, and I'm well aware of the Democratic platform and that's not really what they advocate for.

They advocate for greater consideration of demographics in hiring decisions, particularly at public institutions or agencies, but not "fuck qualifications, you must hire this person because if not you're a racist".

Yeah, I'm sure they can find qualified female workers to fill those positions.