Message from @backacts
Discord ID: 515044918012674050
I bet this "investigation" isn't going to end until after 2020 lol
Hell maybe it'd go past his second term
given how much Mueller and now the HPSCI and other bodies will dig up, or already have - Trump won't last much longer. Love it!
Pretty sure it will end up with liberals crying again, democrats saying it wasn’t enough time and Trump sailing into his second term with both houses again. It’s truly a great political atmosphere we live in—everything in flux leaves everyone wanting more of politics? Craziness! I love it too.
@MikeHaydenOnCoffeeBreak And just what has been "dug up"?😂
how many times do i need to outline it?
😂 *sigh* silly trumptards, their stupidity never stops.
HPSCI, Mueller, SSCI, the USIC and House/Senate Judiciary confirmed Russian interference and collusion with Trump's inner circle.
1) SSCI reviewed the classified intel underlying the ICA 2017 and affirmed it.
2) HPSCI's Russian interference report noted and documented the interference, it did try and downplay collusion, but thankfully HPSCI minority report noted it, and now they can now gain more info into it.
3) Mueller has several indictments under his belt, further showing the CI evidence supporting Russian interference. He has been successful in the Courts upholding against Russian Court challenges in attempts to suppress the overwhelming evidence.
In several of the Mueller indictments, including plea deals, and other briefs before a number of different Courts, he has outlined several of Trump's inner circle has having communication in 2015/6 with current/former Russian officials, back channels, arranged meetings, and gaining information from GRU operatives known to those individuals at the time.
House Judiciary confirmed and released documents
outlining the Russian/Trump tower meeting.
Kush also provided evidence publicly.
All of this and more can be found deep in all of this litigation, and much of it there is!
<:OOF:475784333370589184>
All that is hardly convincing. Claims are not evidence. Even eyewitnesses are tenuous sources at best, even though they are recognised in court.
each document, under perjury, outlines the evidence.
Not just statements. Sorry kiddo, you got BTFO'd
https://www.dni.gov/files/icotr/17th_Joint_Assessment_Dec_2017_10.16.18.pdf
```No intentional violations. Consistent
with previous Joint Assessments, no
instances of intentional circumvention or
violation of those procedures were found.```
I guess this doc also isn't evidence there was *no* abuse of Section 702 of FAA under its reporting period
<:Thonk:475770135181787138> <:OOF:475784333370589184>
There's clearly a bias here, innocent until proven guilty my ass
@MikeHaydenOnCoffeeBreak I see no evidence there. Just a cursory skim shows nothing but a wall of text, reporting supposed behaviours, actions and reference to laws. If that is evidence then a magazine article is evidence. Sorry, you are going to have to try harder.
1) https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf <- original ICA
2) https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4572124/SSCI-ICA-ASSESSMENT-FINALJULY3.pdf
^SSCI (GOP lead), affirms after seeing more classified, and the classified info supporting it.
3) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4954141-Indictment-7-GRU-Officers-Oct2018.html
^Outlines the CI evidence in order to convict GRU operatives. Courts have upheld the, and shot down Russia's challenges.
4) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4600265-Butina-Affidavit-in-Support-of-Criminal-Complaitn.html#document/p1
^Russian operative makes back channels with another GOP candidate in 2016, as well as Trump's transition team.
5) https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180322/108023/HRPT-115-2.pdf
^HPSCI minority report confirming collusion and infererence
6) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4448611-House-Intel-Committee-Russia-Report.html#document/p1
^HPSCI majority report confirming Russian interference
7) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4424937-Sentencing-Memorandum.html
^One of the Court filings outlining some of Trump's inner circle knew about, and communicated with a GRU operative, further information about this has been brought to light in superseding filings/briefs.
This is only a handful of docs showing support for what I just outlined.
<:OOF:475784333370589184>
@backacts small smooth brainlets getting BTFO'd every day
How can you consider these documents adequate evidence?
Hello!
I've been reading on the Russia probe, and it seems to me like many people in the Trump campaign like Papadoulos have already been found guilty of lying to investigators.
These are the weak links, the people who have agreed to work with the FBI.
Hillary's emails are going to be nothing compared to the shit storm that is going to envelop Donald Trump.
and they were lying to the FBI about their connections to GRU operatives, not just fraud and other crimes 😂
yes, several of the links are Court documents, by Mueller
and seeing how they're doing well in Courts....
oh my yes, that's very strong evidence
https://www.lawfareblog.com/litigation-documents-related-mueller-investigation
look at all that litigation, and all of the times the Courts shot down motions to dismiss evidence, or challenge the authority of Mueller
Ok, I am not saying these documents are false, I am saying they are unconvincing. These aren't like taking documents made by guilty people and saying "look, these guys did this", these documents are secondhand descriptions of what people ***claim to have discovered*** what would be convince is the ***original*** evidence that lead these people to create these documents!
they're convincing for several Judges to side with Mueller over the defendents
Court briefings, by their very nature, outlining the CI evidence against several GRU operatives are very impressive
especially the consequence for information within being wrong, illegal, etc.
being barred from Courts, civil/criminal penalties, and loosing the Court case
i mean, perjury laws exist in Courts for a reason
Claiming that consequences of one's actions hold them back from action is a joke
on top of that, even GOP-controlled congressional investigations admit to Russian interference
you literally have nothing
oh, it's very much the case
I don’t think anything Mueller fabricates will bother Trump much, it’s just a distraction for him.
i mean for example the FBI has always complained that DOJ was very conservative in FISA applications. Why? because of the consequences for being busted by the Court
Trump's already starting to crack, and it's showing publicly
@MikeHaydenOnCoffeeBreak So... walls of text with FBI logo = unquestionable evidence for what I believe in
Just because it was shown in court, it must be true... Because people are scared of lying in court? Rather weak