Message from @🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼
Discord ID: 447690085824200715
So? The problem isn't the law
and in countries that banned abortion this is what happens instead:
and the risk of both the baby and mother dying is increased
which is two lives 🤔
so you support potentially killing twice as many people 🤔
People believe that before a certain point in pregnancy, the child is "not human" or "not living" so they are under the impression that this is not murder.
"so you support potentially killing twice as many people 🤔" No, not once have I said that
I never will
but if you support banning abortion
then it could end up in a scenario
that potentially kills twice as many people
Nope
yes
that's what unsafe abortions are like
are you seriously that retarded?
stop the ad hominems
People believe that before a certain point in pregnancy, the child is "not human" or "not living" so they are under the impression that this is not murder. Teach them otherwise and they will be less likely to attempt it!
You are making a numbers argument to justify murder
Education is the answer, not statistics
youre making another fallacy of composition
no
you're assuming that everyone is 'uneducated' abotu reality
no
who is pro-choice
and i would like evidence for that.
It is not an assumption
then evidence
pro choice people are 'uneducated' about this 'objective' reality that 'a child is not human or living'
i want evidence specifically for that
They say it themselves.
And they don't even care that another life is in question
are they using the word *child* or are you spinning it again for emotion points.
because pro-choice pro-life is all about medical semanitics and economic realities
that's the only things you can argue in certainity
no, it is not.
any emotional argument is just fluff around those.
it doesn't say anywhere in that
that 'a child is not human nor living'