implicitely shows the effectiveness of socialized systems by ranking them well

actually rosenstein and jeff sessions are next to be fired/resign/replaced

effectivness is defined how by them in this study?

dude just read it it explains that

socialized anything doesnt work, ...the end

like the military?

totally debunked!

the military isnt socialized

very partially

it is

entirely

but not very

it's socialist by definition

not really

at all

whats your definition of socialized?

what does socialism mean to you guys?

haha oh

Socialism: when the people (government) run a particular industry or means of production

you know ours, how is the military soxialized

no I actually don't know yours

same as what you just gave

ok so who runs the military

is it private companies?

it's the government

who pays for the military?

is it private companies?

both taxes and private industry

but let me stop you there

ok, so it's socialist

technically by that definition the people are not running the country, deep-state is

because it is run by the state

the military isnt and industry, nor is it a means of production, by that definition not socialist.

just because things are run by the state doesnt mean they are socialist lol

yea that gets into representation, socialism refers to the state as the people, which is a tricky definition because it's often not true

@FriarPop that is the literal definition of socialism

and now there are Light Warriors within the military fighting the Dark side

alongside it has socialist pieces to make it cheaper in places but it isnt socialist

and the LightWarriors are winning

by ownership it is entirely socialist

The military has socialism influenced pieces, but isnt socialist. Also, that paper you cited, focused mostly on doctors