https://www.wnd.com/2007/05/41537/

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/swank/090313

@LadyAquanine that second one defended snopes

it was in favor of it

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2195441/posts

tbh they are okay sources not not really reliable.

but*

https://www.quora.com/Is-Snopes-biased-Why-do-some-people-believe-Snopes-is-biased

ok the third one cites literally nothing

@wahx I forgot to tell you something

as does the third one

Snopes can not be trusted as the end-all of truth and info

no... but it does cite shit

it actually tries to inform people

if you want, you can use it to show one side of the story, and use several other fact-checking websites to back up what you are researching

and yeah @Leiro レイロ I'll respond to dms soon

that's true, want me to find other sources for why george soros is not a nazi sympathizer?

want me to find some about what his agenda is?

absolutely

I hope it has citations and evidence in general

George soros isn't a neo nazi because his agenda dosent suit it.

I didn't say he was a neo-Nazi

he was there when the originals were around

he was young enough to be heavily influenced by them

he owns many front groups, including Fusion GPS, which Hillary's team worked with, and still works with

he also owns the various front companies that hired protestors for various movements, such as Black Lies Matter

george soros does not own fusion gps

that's untrue

he gave a grant to a group that funded fusion gps

it was noted in Ferguson during the protests and riots by locals that most of the people involved were from out of town

or when there were riots at Berkley over conservative speakers coming, that most of the protestors weren't even students

yeah looks like he was involved in that

many were people who had been bussed in by none other than front groups Soros owned

and to be clear, I don't like that there's a rich person trying to influence our society

I detest that

I just think it's strange that george soros comes up so much and lies get spread about him

that's the kind of society we live in today sadly @wahx

the government backs the corporations

and the other way around

I agree with this sentiment

I just think facebook has more political motivation if anything and that their move was due to them feeling "obligated" to steer people towards what they deem to be acceptable points of view. But your view on that matter could very well be the truth. Either way, I've always been against that sort of censorship. But i dont expect facebook to be shut down due to it. I will just not use it. Which I dont anyways.