DoJ statistics show that in all cases except immediate, violent resistance, the victim is likely to be subject to escalation by the hostile actor.

That was what you said.

In all cases it's likely.

When your end state is as critical a potential case as described, you don't go with "Eh nothing bad will happen, probably"

I would say rape is less bad then murder.

So I would prefer no use of lethal force.

You'd rather a woman be raped than kill her attacker?

That's not murder anyway.

I would yes

Wow, you're a special brand of fucked-up, you degenerate-ass mongoloid.

Epic

Top 10 most epic rages on discord.

Nah, it's just kind of stunning to hear someone come out and say that a woman shouldn't be able to defend herself against a rapist

Not with lethal force preferably.

But that's basically the only way to stop a human being quickly enough to prevent something like that.

#rapistlivesmatter

This is the same reason that hostage rescue teams don't try to run in and spray people with OC.

Because pepper spray and less lethal systems do not stop targets.

Then rape is better then killing

You can shoot without killing even.

How do you figure

A gunshot to almost any part of the body is lethal, and usually in short order.

There's no safe place to shoot a human being.

Shot to the foot

I wonder how many times @bandit would have to be raped before he changed his mind

Feet are moving too fast to aim at.

Triggered @katiedid

You can't precisely target someone's hands or feet.

Then let the person be raped

Are you a Muslim? You talk like one.

Inshallah, she had it coming, lol

What?

Inshallah, my dude.

What?

You've let your feelings get to your hed.

👌

Nah, this is predicated on a goodly number of use of force continuum studies.

No feelings to it. Bodying people is all business, man.

Sure thing mate

<:QUEER:475778786130919427>

Dead server