Message from @Mr1Gonzalez

Discord ID: 538615245024002048


2019-01-26 06:42:56 UTC  

@chad not all day but once a day or so

2019-01-26 06:44:12 UTC  

Or anyone who participated in #DestroyYourDickDecember

2019-01-26 06:45:35 UTC  

@Mr1Gonzalez If you're talking about the company name, then why did you use the word "he" when you said he went bankrupt?

2019-01-26 06:50:05 UTC  

Trump is the company. He is Trump. He is the company. The company is sole proprietorship not a corporation. If you operate your business as a sole proprietor, you'll be taxed as a self-employed person, and the income of your business is considered your personal income for tax purposes. You’re literally picking at straws with this argument.

2019-01-26 06:51:08 UTC  

The Trump Organization is the accumulation of 500 different businesses, in which 6 have declared for bankruptcy

2019-01-26 06:51:29 UTC  

That's a pretty good success rate if you ask me, all of which Trump is the primary owner

2019-01-26 06:51:46 UTC  

With that many companies, you can't be so broad

2019-01-26 06:54:35 UTC  

But the claim was that he never did go bankrupt. That amongst the thousands of other misleading claims he allegedly made affects one’s credibility regardless on how you try to make it look a certain way. As I stated in my initial post, it’s his word choice that gets him into trouble. Something nobody has tackled upon. Just strawman attacks that have nothing to do with the original statement

2019-01-26 06:54:36 UTC  

Now you see why saying "Trump went bankrupt" is very misleading to a point where it has flaws in the argument in itself? It misleads people into thinking Trump has declared personal bankruptcy and other misdirections

2019-01-26 06:55:24 UTC  

Trump, the person, did never go bankrupt

2019-01-26 06:55:36 UTC  

Nor has his other 494 businesses

2019-01-26 06:55:41 UTC  

🤦‍♂️

2019-01-26 06:55:54 UTC  

Let me know when you want to tackle on the initial claim I made

2019-01-26 06:56:10 UTC  

So far I’ve been getting around the bush arguments

2019-01-26 06:57:13 UTC  

You've been using common liberal Trump-Bashing talkingpoints, I'm simply targeting those. It gives an excuse and it was a mistake by the media, not by Trump

2019-01-26 06:57:34 UTC  

Again.. Let me know when you want to tackle on the initial claim I made

2019-01-26 06:58:40 UTC  

Well there's two but I'm going to assume it's this "Trump doesn’t need to be so forward either though. Especially with his word choice to quickly make enemies."

2019-01-26 06:59:07 UTC  

Correct and how that he loses credibility due to the choice of words he makes

2019-01-26 07:00:34 UTC  

Choice of words, overall the man is correct. Unless you want to pick straws and say "oh the man's name is also the company so in a sense he went bankrupt." Although I can see where people like you may deem him uncredible due to small generalizations

2019-01-26 07:01:03 UTC  

I see your initial point and acknowledge it in the minimum

2019-01-26 07:04:41 UTC  

Was he correct in saying “I was there when the bombs fell on 9-11”?

2019-01-26 07:05:34 UTC  

Because he didn’t say 911 he said 7-11

2019-01-26 07:06:05 UTC  

My friend I must do more research on that. I don't continue on conversations from the last person that picked off

2019-01-26 07:06:19 UTC  

Or that “Mexico is paying for the wall”

2019-01-26 07:06:24 UTC  

When they said they aren’t

2019-01-26 07:06:58 UTC  

Because he said Mexico wrote him a check for $10 billion

2019-01-26 07:07:07 UTC  

He never said that

2019-01-26 07:07:59 UTC  

"It's an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year,"

2019-01-26 07:08:05 UTC  

Or will write him*

2019-01-26 07:08:16 UTC  

when did he say that

2019-01-26 07:09:45 UTC  

Lol

2019-01-26 07:10:18 UTC  

so he never actually said it...

2019-01-26 07:11:13 UTC  

He typed it

2019-01-26 07:11:16 UTC  

So..

2019-01-26 07:11:44 UTC  

he more than likely had a secretary type it

2019-01-26 07:12:12 UTC  

So you’re implying someone else in his personal detailed wanted to make him look like a liar

2019-01-26 07:12:17 UTC  

Detail*

2019-01-26 07:12:58 UTC  

No, but considering the only time the idea of Mexico writing a check was brought up in this note is kind of sketchy imo

2019-01-26 07:13:53 UTC  

Well it is one of the things that can possibly make him look less credible then, would you agree?