No, that was directed towards you.

i dont want to tho, anthony lol

Smh

Gosh some people in this server can’t read

I’m losing brain cells from this conversation lmaooo

Fucking idiots

Not to mention the standards for woman are lower

Well yeah they’re female.

They’re biologically weaker. There are exceptions

But the exception isn’t the rule.

Yes which is why they shouldn’t be in the infantry

I don’t mind if they’re POGs

Jury is out.

feed them testosterone

I know

But in my opinion

We’ll see. I don’t personally agree with it but I’ll admit I’m wrong if they’re able to pull their own weight.

there's no way tho. cramps are so painful.

And intergratwd units are bad too

Male teams perform much better than integrated teams

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/02/02/army-opens-three-more-posts-to-women-in-infantry-armor/

Obama did some bad shit for the military

Yes , it was unbanning

Lmaooo

obama did a lot of bad shit

But it’s bad

Says the 16 year old expert in the military

Mhm

Lmaoooo

And you talking about guns

“All-male 0311 (rifleman) infantry squads had better accuracy compared to gender-integrated squads. There was a notable difference between genders for every individual weapons system (i.e. M4, M27, and M203) within the 0311 squads, except for the probability of hit & near miss with the M4.”

“All-male infantry crew-served weapons teams engaged targets quicker and registered more hits on target as compared to gender-integrated infantry crew-served weapons teams, with the exception of M2 accuracy.”

This should be an immediate red flag

The women were among 287 successful soldiers out of 1,007 who began the testing on Nov. 14, 82nd Airborne Division spokesman Lt. Col. Joe Buccino told Army Times.

The EIB test includes 30 basic infantry skills and tasks that must be completed with fewer than three errors.

Regardless of gender

What’s this

FACTS

But what

Relevance

Did it have