Message from @DragonAshe
Discord ID: 545075400104083457
Are you actually going to read what I type this time?
sure thing
I know it's hard to scroll up
indeed
So I'll copy and paste this for you to read again
DragonAsheToday at 9:46 PM
If your speech is threatening, intimidating, or cause another person to cry in fear then that is harassment
I don't literally mean that someone crying cause of something you said it harassment
I assume you mean "is harassment"
Jesus christ
I'm clarifying dude
WOOP you got me. lolololol
No shit I mean is
awesome
Shhh I’m trying to sleep
You want a gotcha so bad
nah I'm just trying to make sense of your point
@wahx you know what he means so don't devalue a point by being a grammar nazi
I'm literally just trying to read his sentences coherently
Obviously I mean that making someone cry is harassment
That's all I mean
like nothing else
What if the person is just extra sensitive?
Ok cool, so making someone cry isn't harassment, but threatening, intimidating, or causing another person to cry in fear is harassment
yeah that's pretty spot on
And cries over anything like all sjws
I can make my mom cry with sad news, or by making her laugh
But making her cry by harassing her is different
ok and you don't see how "making some cry isn't harassment" is directly contradictory to "causing another person to cry in fear is harassment"
because that's one of the definitions of harassment you give
in that list
Interesting, why do you think that? I thought I clarified my statement to you
Should I paste my clarification to you again?
Or would you like to stay hung up on this bullshit?
"making someone cry isn't harassment" and "causing another person to cry in fear is harassment" are not contradictory to you?
like, read that
is it the fear bit?
what am I not getting?
Go figure it out yourself. Good luck.
If you threaten a person its a call to action which can fall under legal consequences.
Like i said many fucking times you can say whatever you fucking want, so long as its not a call to action that can fall under legal issues.
and I take no issue with that Srowder, that's not contradictory
that's very clear