Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Discord ID: 553506950218776577
If Yang fries to stop it, companies will move countries and you have a bigger job loss
Tries*
I am saying... If it always created more jobs. why have half the 4 million jobs lost to automation in the midwest and 2 million of them have never worked again @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
please demonstrate that actually happened
And I repeat, do you think it would be better if people worked more?
Pep in I told you
Intervention and welfare
And that's not jobs
“Another factor is the growing trend of occupational licensing. Requiring licenses to become a pet-sitter or hair braider has made it more difficult for people to launch new careers.”
Welfare subsidies unproductive activities
And intervention just raises the cost of business and results in lower demand for workers
I'm not here to find sources for you @Kaladin maybe later sure ask me then
Things like a min wage is a good example of why automation is happening faster
Well, faster, but it would happen anyway
and that's a good thing
Yeah and it would not be so exacerbated
Humans won’t be fully replaced, ever
Companies know they need to survive they need money
That money can only come if people are working to buy their products
That's kind of subsidizing is in the same vain as what Andrew Yang is talking about by bringing up UBI @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
UBI is less worse
Well, that's interfered with by government as well
But it’s still bad
UBI is the same thing, and welfare wouldn't go away
Mhm
The whole downfall of the rust belt has been due to intervention and welfare
Simple as that
And for that democrats are to blame
4 million manufacturing jobs lost to automation had nothing to do with it i'm sure
and republicans
Yes but those could have been re allocated
dude, are you listening to what you are saying
But they didnt !
You are an NPC rn dude
I’m saying the reason why they didn’t is intervention
The reality is. They didn't !
Welfare
Yes I’m saying. Why
But you want more of this
There are no jobs for them