You’re removing it from the context

Plus

You say why don’t I say something constructive

However every time I say something that goes against your opinion you knock it down with out looking as to why

That’s being closed minded

Nobody can teach to people that aren’t open minded

you used the same argument against sid when I know he considers sources from our previous discussions

The one time I seen you do really well on debates (thought I don’t know all your history) was when you started posting links on tomatoes

That was your best argument

And

im not gonna look at myself for this one because idk, but sid does look at the other side

I didn’t even try to go against that

However

Don’t tell me I’m wrong when I’m posting links backing up my claims and the other person didn’t send one source throughout the whole debate

if you really want to see my links you can take the 5 sec it takes to google my claim

I’m not gonna prove your claim wtf. If you make the claim you have the Burden Of Proof

we both know thats what everyone does on an online debate besides a few instances where people actually take the time to look for sources

It’s common debating

Don’t do that

If you make a claim, it’s your burden of proof to back it up

Not mine

okay let's say i don't back my claims up

sid does, yet you still called him bad

Ok

Not my job to do your homework sweetie 💅

No he didn’t

Go ahead and post where he sent some kind of link or pic when we were debating earlier

I’ll let you know I was the only one that posted anything in relation to the debate

Again, you send the screenshot, you made the claim he did

sure

that's fair

I’ll remind you, his claim was “the south isn’t racist”

I responded with cases that proved people in the south were

He responded with a picture of a crab

Heyo

What’s the debate here

We are arguing about what happened earlier

A debate about a debate

truly a high IQ discussion

Talking about burden of proof in debating

I see