Message from $P!KY\/!k!NG in Willem Petzer Live Chat #theology
Thank you, Now I know where your loyalty lies.
As to the answer for your question, since you choose the snowflake, your offspring will not know God, and their offspring will not know god, and so forth... Like you , they will learn to reason according to their prejudices and material purist perspective
No law against breeding with an unbeliever. The mongrel is lost regardless.
GOD DOES NOT ACCEPT MONGRELS.
"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon."
This has nothing to do with money.
You know... mammon
Like have you even read the book???
Dude, that is a quote... Matthew 6:24
Money symbolises material value lol
I know its a quote. About the love of money.
racial purity is material value
Racial purity is obedience to God.
whatever dude, look you and I certainly interpret the literature very differently. Let's agree to disagree, and will leave the judgement for the day still to come.
You interpret nothing. That's the problem. You have quoted one or two verses from one questionable witness. 😂
You haven't even answered my question regarding deut 23
What was the question you didnt get an answer to?
@Daniel van Straaten I'm a straight white bible reading male who wants to have white babies 😁
Race mixing is a crime against humanity
@SheamusOh and beastiality is also against God's law so breeding with the blue haired commie is definitely the more obedient option. Plus beastiality is gross dude. Come on 😂
That is good that you read the Bible. I also prefer my ethnic group but I would not say it is a sin for a person to marry someone of a different ethnic group. That is a man made law.
Would you bang a christian dog too or do you just stick to the beasts of the field? 😂
Atleast you can convert the blue haired commie if you race mix you destroy something that your ancestors have preserved for centuries
@Daniel van Straaten Then you have to answer deut 23. And every other verse I've posted.
@DewaldExactly my point. You're literally destroying the image of God by destroying the white race.
@Dewald And if she refuses? What are you going to do to spread your seed? Justify rape just to get your seed to spread? Hence the cucked nature of that choice
I don't know 🤔 ridiculous suppositions are not something I generally ponder...
What if both of them refuse then ?
Well the idea to entertain is that you are the one having to make the choice, both are then already interested obviously, say the only two you have a choice of... one wants you to be faithful to God, the other wants you to deny God... Dont try to avoid the objective of determining your loyalty, if you try and wriggle your way out by trying to move the goal posts, you only expose your deceitful nature. Just accept it as it is, if that was the truth, not saying it is, hence i need you to have the capacity to entertain the idea, without having to accept it.
@$P!KY\/!k!NG They are part of the ceremonial laws and now abrogated (besides a person from any ethnic group could become a Israelite and marry another Israelite in the old despensation ):
See Westminster Confession of Faith.
III. Beside this law, commonly called moral, God was pleased to give to the people of Israel, as a church under age, ceremonial laws, containing several typical ordinances, partly of worship, prefiguring Christ, His graces, actions, sufferings, and benefits;(d) and partly holding forth divers instructions of moral duties.(e) All which ceremonial laws are now abrogated, under the new testament.(f)
(d) Heb. 9 chap.; Heb. 10:1; Gal. 4:1, 2, 3; Col. 2:17.
(e) I Cor. 5:7; II Cor. 6:17; Jude ver. 23.
(f) Col. 2:14, 16, 17; Dan. 9:27; Eph. 2:15, 16.
@SheamusDenying God was never part of the first supposition. You are moving the goalposts christcuck. Stop projecting.
I could in that case just choose neither and still be obedient to God.
Of course it was part of the first supposition.
Sheamus - Today at 8:44 PM
What??? lol, what even?
Simple question dude, entertain the idea if you have the capacity to do so... you have two choices, a healthy looking reasonable black christian woman, or a white slutty blue haired wiccan snowflake. You choose which motherland you will continue your seed with. How do you reason and judge righteously between those two options?
Do you choose to remain faithful to God, or do you abandon and deny God just to maintain your racial purity?
@Daniel van Straaten Don't give two shits about any church's confessions of faith. They stand for nothing as can be clearly seen by the hordes of queers and christcucks like 'ol sheamus here in the pews every sunday (not the actual sabbath by the way).
Yes you could choose neither, and that would be a better choice, which is reasonable.