the universe is infinite, gg

cant have infinite in a non infinite existence

Says you

yes

says me

OK boomer. Watch me

No it doesn't, because you're assuming that we are automatically inclined to only care about ourselves just because we are made in the image of God and animals aren't

hypotheticals can have inifinite beings

Just because we can eat them, doesn't mean we don't have a duty to look after the planet

hypotheticals aren't measurable results that comport to reality necessarily

thats not the point of a hypothetical

if it can only be infinite in a hypothetical, then theres no reason to accept the claim as having any practical implication on reality

It's just used to show conclusions of your worldview

if someone says they are a pacafist

okay, so even if @Phalanx build an ai that would consistently slaughter all life, it would still not be infinite

you dont have to put them in a situation where theyd commit violence

you just have to say

If you were in a situation where your mom was getting raped, would you commit violence

see?

*All animal life

But yeah

so your conclusion of anything being infinite is simply untrue

Its not a logical contradiction

its logically possible

That's besides the point because eating animals in moderation is not as equally morally justifiable as killing all life that isn't human

no, it isnt

it doesnt comport to reality

where is the contradiction

the fact that we live in a zero sum energy universe that's innately finite

thus, nothing infinite within it can exist as any physical state of being

Dude you can't lift a rock up and down infinite times, how're you gonna kill infinite beings?

nah, nah you see @Phalanx

its logically coherent in my hypothetical that doesnt comport to reality

I'm not sure what you are saying at this point

So i can just conclude that lived reality of the practice of your ideology will have a result that doesnt comport to reality

Epic

It's pretty clear what he's saying

So do you reject hypotheticals?

No he doesn't

So whats the point

that your argument is pretty shit when it cant work within the premises of observable reality