Message from @Phalanx
Discord ID: 661618344994013223
thats not the point of a hypothetical
if it can only be infinite in a hypothetical, then theres no reason to accept the claim as having any practical implication on reality
It's just used to show conclusions of your worldview
if someone says they are a pacafist
okay, so even if @Phalanx build an ai that would consistently slaughter all life, it would still not be infinite
you dont have to put them in a situation where theyd commit violence
you just have to say
If you were in a situation where your mom was getting raped, would you commit violence
see?
*All animal life
But yeah
so your conclusion of anything being infinite is simply untrue
Its not a logical contradiction
its logically possible
That's besides the point because eating animals in moderation is not as equally morally justifiable as killing all life that isn't human
no, it isnt
it doesnt comport to reality
where is the contradiction
the fact that we live in a zero sum energy universe that's innately finite
thus, nothing infinite within it can exist as any physical state of being
nah, nah you see @Phalanx
its logically coherent in my hypothetical that doesnt comport to reality
I'm not sure what you are saying at this point
So i can just conclude that lived reality of the practice of your ideology will have a result that doesnt comport to reality
Epic
It's pretty clear what he's saying
So do you reject hypotheticals?
No he doesn't
So whats the point
that your argument is pretty shit when it cant work within the premises of observable reality
I can
thats no problem
okay, thus you concede that it can not be infinite?
In a hypothetical it can
<:brainlet:437581953068171264>
which is what I've been talking about
lol
Honestly lol
hypothetically gunga ginga
I mean where is the contradiction with infinite in a hypothetical