cant lawyers refuse to work for you in court?

and dont they have to do a background check?

so, I accidentally did't mute myself, and I said fuck

It's complicated. I am not a lawyer but it can be considered harming a person if you agree to take up their case and then drop them in the middle of the process because then the opposition has an advantage.

I do't think that the customer heard it

I dont mean drop the case mid-court

No I mean mid preparation.

This is all he's got left to try to silence the issue and he doesn't really have a leg to stand on

I mean when onion boi trys to contact the lawyers

cant they refuse?

By the time a trial happens (if it happens) both sides pretty much know each other's arguments. If your attorney drops, then the other council has had more time to prepare.

They can refuse.

good

hope they do

so greg wouldnt have anyone for backup

If the attorney thinks the case isn't worth taking up, they don't have to unless they are a public defender or something of the sort.

You would think lawyers would refuse to work for someone like Onision but they do, worse people than him too. It brings them not just money but notoriety too if the person or case is well known

o

wouldn't it hurt their reputation?

theres so much proof of greg being a pedo

or groomer

That depends. Being in this discord, we are all probably pretty biased. We don't know what potential council has seen.

Or not seen.

It's a risk they take, if they could win it would be a huge boost to their career and even if they lose depending how they performed as a lawyer they might get more work too

cant you present videos in the court?

I mean what's been seen, is that Greg is a sociopathic liar, and has a habit of trying to make himself look perfect.

@TallBrokenDoor They can be taken out of context, he can just claim they were all "skits"

I don't think this case is too high profile. This isn't a big deal outside of the YouTube bubble.

It is high profile enough to be reported on outside of YouTube sometimes

Not forgetting Chris was very well known prior to being on YouTube

you still have his victims interview's

but greg would try to strike them down

That's probably more due to Chris Hansen's fame.

Here is my reference point: all kinds of millionaires and public figured like news personalities get into disputes every day and we rarely hear about it. A Google algorithm might put this one in front of you more because you're watching videos about it already. I bet you most people haven't heard if this.

Greg cannot prove slander, the worst he can claim is these women are lying about their experiences and deny their accusations

Onision can't strike the videos down and even if they aren't on YouTube they're still recorded and usable in court.

buy gold

good

I expected Chris Hansen to get sued, but not Daniel, unless something just went out that would do it.

Daniel has been exposing onion for the entire decade

if I remember

At least I'd expect the interviewed victims to be more likely to be sued.

Right, but that's a decade where he never got sued. That's bad for Onision.