contains both "freedom of speech" and "freedom of religion"

and if male circumcision is banned

SJWs are going to successfully pass hate speech laws

and the end game of hate speech laws

is people getting arrested for jokes

which is happening in much of europe

there was a case of a youtuber makeing a joke about nazis by getting his dog to to a faux sing heil

as a joke

count dankula

and he was arrested and convicted

that's horrific

and I don't want that shit in my country

Well I'm a very strong believer in freedom of religion and autonomy. And because of that, I'm a strong believer in consent. And I think that's really the main issue here.

im just worried about literally anything that's a threat to the first amendment

because i say things online each and everyday

that I would get arrested for

in much of europe

or canada

or anywhere else in the west

I agreea about the free speech thing. That case should never have been in a court

I mean, it kinda goes against what the law is meant to be even.

Sure but I think that’s sort of a bad slippery slope argument. I don’t think the First Amendment would be hindered in a significant way of involuntary circumcision is outlawed.

If*

Both are entirely different fundamentally

One goes with bodily autonomy

right but you have to understand

99 percent of society

thinks "hate speech"

is more important

i mean

is worse

than male circumcision

like let's say

and this is going to sound silly but bare with me

if I cut a man's dick off

and then called a woman a cunt

most of society

would think me calling a woman a cunt

was the worst of the two things

now given that's the case

if you ban male circumcision