K. I seem to have arrgravated you in some way so I apologise

Well you could do it less with info and more just a Hi, and then what you are hoping to get out of the movement or just why you are here, that way it could be easier for everyone to be on the same page ?

An intro is an intro. I couldn’t care less about what people put in it.

But it should be there in case we need it.

If someone doesn’t want to write one, oh well. We aren’t kicking them out over it.

It’s there for people who want it

If someone were to have a breakdown, me for example, I wouldn’t want someone referring to me as Jango.

You wouldn’t want to be called Abbysol

Etc

Tbh I thought that was your real name

And I thought you where really an Insane Caterpillar 😮

I'm actually a cat. My avatars is a pic of me. Sometimes I think I'm a caterpillar cause I'm insane

See, it all makes sense now!

But in all honesty I do get what you are saying, but I think if things are that stressful you are probably better off going into DMs with someone, that little bit of privacy can help a lot if it is something that personal

Also since anyone can join the discord, it may not be that safe (though that would be in an extreme scenario, it is still a concern)

So what's your guy's opinions on #thotaudit

It’s pointless

The irs doesn’t handle personal cases

It still begs the question

?

If sex work is real work why isn't it taxed?

A lot of things go untaxed

because it is unregulated

Doesn’t make it right

it should be regulated, it would make it safer for the sex workers too

I totally agree

<#515246258571575297>

According to Phillip DeFranco the types of cam girls and Snapchat girls do have to pay taxes. If they aren't keeping a track of those earnings they're going to find themselves in trouble.

Cam girls and twitch streamers probably aren't that stupid. But I wouldn't put it past the odd Snapchat girl sending nudes to college frats.

As for prostitution. It's illegal anyway. The government don't collect taxes on drug money either, unless it's laundered.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a121ol/mom_is_preparing_6_year_old_trans_kid_for

The hell. Does anyone know any more about this ^

No but it looks insane if it's accurate

Whether it's accurate or not idk but it's definitely insane the way it's portrayed... If I can find out more about it and it is, then it wouldn't be the first thing that surprised me about how backwards the world can be

The article keeps using the dichotomy of what the child does when he's with Mom or what he does when he's with Dad. Nobody has independently talked to the child on their own. Or observed him in a neutral environ

Environment

Even if that's true, the courts are telling the father things like he can't choosevhis child's clothes for him, while the mother's taken him to some specialist and worked with them to diagnose him with gender disphoria based on her word

And I don't think it is true

"Eyewitness accounts from friends corroborate dad’s observations of James preferring to be a boy. Bill Lovell, the senior pastor of Christ Church Carrollton, wrote: “Based on the three occasions I’ve spent time with him, I’d say he acts and looks unmistakably like a healthy six-year-old boy. … I am praying for James, an average six-year-old boy, a sweet-natured, intelligent, lovable and at this point particularly vulnerable young man, caught up in a titanic clash of worldviews.”

Ellen Grigsby shared in an email her observations after meeting James and his fraternal twin brother for the first time: “They were both ‘all boy’ and were having a great time. Both boys were absolutely dressed as boys and behaving as boys.”

Sarah Scott is a family friend and mother of three boys who frequently play with James and his brother. She and her husband are sensitive to allowing James to lead the way in gender choices such as names, pronouns, and clothing. I asked her the obvious question: “How do you know James does not want to be a girl?” Sarah responded in an email with several examples she’s seen of James’ desire to remain a boy:

So depending on the situation I could see the use of the laws. Protecting a real transgender child from an abusive parent.

The issue comes from the family court bias against him as a father and nobody is willing to assess whether the mother is being vindictive

This is why a 3rd party evaluation should be the first go to

Without it is an explicit example of taking the mother's side over there father with no evidence other than what the mother has presented.

The issue being is I've seen that happen