Not "beating them with a crowbar".
punished wants to beat them with a crowbar apparently.
wew
>steal You do realize you are putting property above human being here, right?
yea
not at all, i’m saying that you don’t have the right to steal something from another person.
says who
says government in our current case.
tell me
what is the state
the state is a group of individuals with the perceived right to initiate force over a certain geographical area.
how does that differ from a family
who owns property
you don’t shoot your kids when they disobey.
<:brainlet:508484031625691156>
I said family for a fucking reason
But if the father would ground his kids you would barge into their room screaming "What do you want to do, kill them?!"
is it ok for father joe to spank his kids
because spanking is violence
generally kids are under custody of parents until a certain age, and don’t exhibit the same protections grown adults do.
but its violence against another individual
not with the intent to significantly harm them.
and my intent against alcohol man is not to harm him
How does that differ from your alcoholic friend?
but to damage his supply of alcohol
what gives you the right to decide what another person can and cannot have?
Back to the kids question.
Who am I to decide what my kids should do?
their parent, that’s who.
the government is not my parent, though.
And I am his friend.
you aren’t his parent, and you don’t have custody over him.
Why do you think only in terms of "ownership"?
the kids are my property in ancapistan i guess
There are so many symbiotic relationships even in nature.
custody and property are different.
you’re allowed to have a symbiotic relationship, but only voluntarily.
you can’t force it on someone, or else it isn’t mutual.
If a part of my relationship wants to kill themselves I will prevent that by force.
Would you?
how long can you stop them?
