probably not.

not to say it wouldn’t improve things, of course.

In an ancap society

how would you stop someone from buying up land and declaring their own country?

So even if it would vastly reduce the amount of signifigant violence

you wouldnt support it

on an individual basis removal of those who commit violence is acceptable, but generalizing to the point of 50% collateral damage isn’t acceptable.

halving the amount of murders isnt acceptable?

there are ways to do so without 50% collateral

i said

deport

not genocide

50% of the people you deport are innocent

Discord TOS

what is this about

deporting black people

Tfw i got censored

@The Big Oof Water's view focuses on violence being bad

and that we should avoid all violence

and the state uses violence to rule

a pretty retarded view

Would you not use violence or the threat of violence to declare your own personal sovereignty in a stateless society?

I already asked such

with no force, it's going to be impossible

he even admits its unrealistic

ironic, as he has a crusader in his avi

Most people are lazy and not motivated to stand for something

or against something

its why most people are status quoist

Others would deem something too dangerous

and the extent that they will go to try and change society

is voting

That's why the libertarian view of the world is unrealistic

even antifa limits itself to just vandalism and punching people they deem alt right

not even just the ancap view

but the free market one as a whole

It assumes people give a shit

They don;t

People still buy products from shitty companies