id ban all drugs

if it doesn’t directly threaten him, it’s not your job to intervene with violence.

banning things creates a market for them.

wew

Making things legal makes a market for them as well.

A larger one.

Because it's legal.

in some cases, yes.

but the illegal trade of things like drugs and alcohol has proven vastly more harmful than the legal trade.

nearly 80% of violent crime in america is related to drugs.

damn i don’t have the source for that rn

would you support the deportation of all blacks

after all, they're 13% of the population yet are responsible for more than 50% of all murder

i would support the right of property owners and landlords to create an ethnically pure area, sure.

but not removal by force.

In America

not in ayncrapistan

my point still stands, you shouldn’t *have* to let black people live in your apartment building.

would you be fine with the USA deporting all blacks

probably not.

not to say it wouldn’t improve things, of course.

In an ancap society

how would you stop someone from buying up land and declaring their own country?

So even if it would vastly reduce the amount of signifigant violence

you wouldnt support it

on an individual basis removal of those who commit violence is acceptable, but generalizing to the point of 50% collateral damage isn’t acceptable.

halving the amount of murders isnt acceptable?

there are ways to do so without 50% collateral

i said

deport

not genocide

50% of the people you deport are innocent

Discord TOS

what is this about

deporting black people

Tfw i got censored

@The Big Oof Water's view focuses on violence being bad

and that we should avoid all violence

and the state uses violence to rule

a pretty retarded view

Would you not use violence or the threat of violence to declare your own personal sovereignty in a stateless society?