We tried that shit 3 times in Haiti and it failed

We're already *catching* things regardless because they're being mass imported into our countries, they would never have to leave if we were to rule them well enough for their countries not to be shitholes

If the effects of ruling them means reparations and eventually egalitarian behavior im out

Take the brits for example, they rule fine and fairly for years they get rebelled against and then those who use to be subjugated from the colonies are now equal

because they act "civilized"

They now get special treatment and practically rule their old rulers, its a two way street in which we give prosperity and they give calamity

I've never seen a poo in loo ask for reperations

They do though

especially the Pakis

by rulling them I mean literally conquering their countries but keep the races separated and regimented.

as in having them as a subservient caste almost

So basically the Brits

they tried that

it fucked them over in the long run

Hi

Isn't the word empire also useable for the ownership of extensive territories?

Hello

hey

I think it does

im pretty sure isolationism would be best, they have some catching up to do and us trying to speed it up has only backfired the most i would suggest would be to allow missionaries or private charities but nothing from the state

lol

Shen needs to fix the language filter

its meant to filter out slurs and stuff so discord doesn't go crazy

what?

ok theres that

N*ggers

HAHAH

@The Big Oof

i cant say n*gger

why

Because muh discord

But it's only naggers

fucking naggers

i hate naggers like my favorite fortniter ninja

i cant accept private charities over that shit NGOs did with bringing n*ggers into europe and masking them as Syrian refugees

I kinda wish the British would do what the arabs did and sterilize their slaves

but uh oh that's not christiean ecks d'd'd'd'd'

Typical (((Google)))

@ImATomato im pretty sure slavery in general is not christiean.