I must hand it to these fuckers though that they've managed to entirely co-opt the leftist movement in the West. Which, I suspect, was the original intention. I mean it has certainly served the elites well that there's no genuine Marxist mass movement 🤔

they just use pleasure and individualism to justify their wants

@Xinyue *in your opinion*

Few things weren't working for Marxists....the dialectical approach of classes wasn't connecting, and the cold war was active....so they switched tactics and used different names

they dont actually want to help people, they want the fame and rewards of helping people

Adorno's F-Scale is classic - you just dont know yet

Can I post a PDF here?

it has served the elites well tho, y'all are useful pawns 😁

well not the Marxists here i think

@AdorableStormtrooper in my opinion? there's objectively no connection between the writings of Marx and Engels and the ideology of these people. none. they took over, and this is actually the origin of the term *"New Left"* - juxtaposed against the *"Old Left"*, the left of marxian thinking

yes

<#507036888205623296> @RealBullWhip

ok

New Left were all Marxists who became PoMo

PoMo is a tool to a means

lmao fucking cultural Marxists trying to classify fascism

and in process stopped being Marxists

I ignore all of those fucks because their academic sophistry is pure circlejerking and none of it has any value.

Postmodernism and Marxism are irreconcilable

and the two usually dislike each other

They're not intellectually honest, but i guess this data you cannot comprehend

uHhHHHh fascism is when u mean and masculine >>>:(((

All of Frankfurt School thought on fascism.

Reworded a million ways.

PoMo and Marxism are irreconcilable

they are truly irreconcilable yes

but they only use PoMo as it serves them to the end goal

there's an underlying marxism

they're disingenuous intellectuals

can you identify this mysterious, "underlying marxism"?

and "muh eguality" is not sufficient quantification

The entire basis of the academic left post-WWII was based off of cultural Marxist ideas cultivated in the 20's and 30's which rejected Soviet authoritarianism and democratic socialism in favor of an intersectional anti-authority alliance.

the equation u identified with the base structure and superstructure, or that Marx did, they pretty much saw it as not a one way street, the New Left was a Psychoanalytical movement too, they saw it as a Relationship @Xinyue

It's a Hegelian/Marxist dialectic and it's documented history.

There is nothing conspiratorial about it.

They've infected academia ever since they came over on their banana boats during and after WWII.

Posted

They think they can effect Material conditions based on how they can influence culture and morals of the ppl(goal being communism). It is derived from Marx, i guess you can claim it's a different movement..? @Xinyue

Lol what ? It has more in common with nietzchean thought than marxism(ie fouccalt)

What the fuck?

What does it have in common with Nietzsche?